Misplaced Pages

User talk:Xandar

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jbmurray (talk | contribs) at 21:42, 16 June 2008 (Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Karanacs: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:42, 16 June 2008 by Jbmurray (talk | contribs) (Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Karanacs: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archive

Archive

Xandar, I hope you don't mind that I created an archive for you and archived your long talk page that is almost two years old! Revert me if you prefer all that discussion. NancyHeise (talk) 07:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Award for being a friend

Xandar, thanks for sticking up for me and helping me through the wild RCC FAC. You did a great job trying to keep opposers focused on FAC criteria - something that we should not have had to remind them of if they really were worthwhile FAC reviewers! I thought your arguments were perfectly sound and that you endured the worst kind of unwarranted attacks from people who should have been listening to you instead. I am sorry for the trouble you went through to stick up for me and our work. Hang in there and dont worry about Tony or Sandy. They don't like me either (but really, everyone else does :) :) :) NancyHeise (talk) 07:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

responding to Raul's request

Xandar, I think your idea fits Raul's request, please see my answer to your question on my talk page. NancyHeise (talk) 03:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Karanacs

Hi. You have previously indicated your interest in Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Karanacs, by directly editing that page before its transclusion. In order to improve the discussion there (and without trying to persuade you either to support or to oppose), I'm simply writing to tell you that the RfA is now live, and to encourage you to participate. Many thanks. --jbmurray (talkcontribs) 21:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)