Misplaced Pages

User talk:Xandar

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jbmurray (talk | contribs) at 23:45, 16 June 2008 (→Re: Featured Article Candidate RCC: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:45, 16 June 2008 by Jbmurray (talk | contribs) (→Re: Featured Article Candidate RCC: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Archive

Archive

Xandar, I hope you don't mind that I created an archive for you and archived your long talk page that is almost two years old! Revert me if you prefer all that discussion. NancyHeise (talk) 07:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Award for being a friend

Xandar, thanks for sticking up for me and helping me through the wild RCC FAC. You did a great job trying to keep opposers focused on FAC criteria - something that we should not have had to remind them of if they really were worthwhile FAC reviewers! I thought your arguments were perfectly sound and that you endured the worst kind of unwarranted attacks from people who should have been listening to you instead. I am sorry for the trouble you went through to stick up for me and our work. Hang in there and dont worry about Tony or Sandy. They don't like me either (but really, everyone else does :) :) :) NancyHeise (talk) 07:18, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

responding to Raul's request

Xandar, I think your idea fits Raul's request, please see my answer to your question on my talk page. NancyHeise (talk) 03:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Karanacs

Hi. You have previously indicated your interest in Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_adminship/Karanacs, by directly editing that page before its transclusion. In order to improve the discussion there (and without trying to persuade you either to support or to oppose), I'm simply writing to tell you that the RfA is now live, and to encourage you to participate. Many thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 21:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Re: Featured Article Candidate RCC

(copied over from my talk page:) Xandar:

  1. As I have told you, the nomination was not suspended; it was failed. I'm not sure why you continue to suggest otherwise. As such, even the section header here is misleading: the article is not currently a featured article candidate.
  2. As I have also repeatedly said, my immediate responses to Raul254's comments on the last FAC are here, and can also be found on multiple parts of Talk:Roman_Catholic_Church.
  3. I have also repeatedly tried, with the best interests of the article uppermost, to suggest more productive ways in which you could be reacting to the FAC failure. I'm not at all sure why you do not want to listen.

I honestly fear that you, we, and everyone is simply heading for a repeat of the problems already seen repeatedly with this article at FAC. This would be in nobody' best interest, least of all those of the article itself. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 23:44, 16 June 2008 (UTC)