Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nereocystis (talk | contribs) at 17:01, 28 August 2005 (Creation of article). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: {insert UTC timestamp with ~~~~~}), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 00:56, 29 December 2024 (UTC).

• (Researcher99 | talk | contributions)

Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

Researcher99 has been unwilling to resolve disputes with Nereocystis on Talk:Polygamy over many months. He has been asked multiple times over many months to discuss the text of the Polygamy article and stop discussing what he perceives as past abuses and insults.

Description

{Add summary here, but you must use the section below to certify or endorse it. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Since May, 2005, Researcher99 has complained that Nereocystis vandalized the Polygamy article. Between May and August, 2005, 5 people have requested that Researcher99 discuss the text of the Polygamy article and stop discussing the claims of past abuse. Researcher99 has refused to do so. 3 people have tried to provide outside help. Researcher99 delayed voting on a poll resolving the issue for one month.

When Researcher99 discusses content, the discussion go around in circles, Researcher99 does not answer questions, does not provide citations, and when he does, citation follow his POV, which is Christian polygamy.

Evidence of disputed behavior

(provide diffs and links)

1. 16 May created Solution Needed for Gangs of Sneaky Vandals
2. 17 June Researcher99 continues attacking Nereocystis's behavior, no discussion of text and more attacking of Nereocystis
3. 18 July Researcher99 explains how he is oppressed by anti-polygamists, but didn't discuss the text of the article
4. 18 July Researcher99 opposes Hawstom's poll, offers no alternative
5. August 5 Researcher99 suggests resolution, insists that Nereocystis defer to Researcher99's proven expertise.
6. August 18 Researcher99 wants to discuss past
7. August 26 Researcher99 again does not address the article, but continues talking about past events
8. August 26 Researcher99 again does not provide outline, and postpones conversation for a few days, past deadline for outline
9. August 26 Researcher99 attacks Nereocystis on Group marriage talk page, does not want to move discussion, user talk page edit called vandalism

Applicable policies

{list the policies that apply to the disputed conduct}

1. Misplaced Pages:Assume good faith
2. Misplaced Pages:Writers' rules of engagement
   1. Work towards consensus
   2. Don't filibuster
3. Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette
   1. Argue facts, not personalities.
   2. Don't ignore questions.
4. Misplaced Pages:Civility
5. Misplaced Pages:Cite sources
6. Misplaced Pages:Verifiability

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

1. 16 May Nereocystis requests discussion on talk page
2. 7 June Dan100 provides 3rd opinion
3. 7 June Hawstom agrees with Dan100
4. 18 June Dan100 repeats request to focus on issues
5. 18 June Hawstom suggests forgetting past conduct, editing and discussing, starts poll
6. 4 August Nereocystis list proposals, suggests that Researcher99 should come up with suggestion, or accept someone's suggestion for resolution of problem
7. August 16 Uriah923 offers to mediate
8. August 18 Uriah923 requests outline from both participants
9. August 18 Nereocystis provides outline
10. August 25 Uriah923 gives Research99 until August 26 to submit outline
11. August 25 Dunkelza suggests that Researcher99 provides outline, stop claims of abuse
12. August 25 Dunkelza suggests moving group marriage discussion to polygamy
13. August 26 Uriah923 again requests an outline

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

(sign with ~~~~)

1. Nereocystis 17:01, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.