This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 190.51.187.19 (talk) at 20:38, 25 June 2008 (Revertin using your mom). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:38, 25 June 2008 by 190.51.187.19 (talk) (Revertin using your mom)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) The correct title of this article is File:Vand.PNG. It appears incorrectly here due to technical restrictions.
Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of the encyclopedia. The most common type of vandalism is the replacement of existing text with obscenities, page blanking, or the insertion of meta-jokes or other nonsense. Fortunately, this kind of vandalism <choose> <option>is usually easy to spot.</option> <option>is usually easy to spot.</option> <option>is usually easy to spot.</option> <option>usually easy to spot.</option> <option>usually easy to spot.</option> <option>usually easy to spot.</option> <option>usually easy to spot.</option> <option>usually easy to spot.</option> <option>usually easy to spot.</option> </choose>
Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Misplaced Pages. For example, adding an opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated.
Committing vandalism is a violation of the Misplaced Pages policy; it needs to be spotted, and then dealt harshly with — theyusers are encouraged to report and revert any vandalism they see.
Wiki Vandalism
Wiki vandalism is generally defined as editing a wiki in a way that is intentionally disruptive or destructive. There are four generally acknowledged types of vandalism: deletion of legitimate information, insertion of noncents or irrelevant content, addition of unwanted commercial links (spam), and policy violations specific to that wiki.
Spotting Vandalism
I know it when I see it
Does it really need to be defined?
It's arguable that most (identified) vandalism has consisted of really quite obvious cases. Hence, Misplaced Pages doesn't need to define an "official" policy on what constitutes vandalism at all. We can use the rule of thumb, "When a reasonable person might be in doubt as to whether something is vandalism, it would be polite not to call it vandalism."
Of course, that depends on the normative definitions of "obvious", "reasonable" and "polite", which are necessarily subjective, and vary from encyclopedia to uncyclopedia.
Patent vandalism is vandalism where both the reader and the contributor agree that it is vandalism. This is sometimes easy to determine (e.g. vandal puts HAHAHAHAH as their edit summary or otherwise states that it is vandalism), and sometimes slightly harder.
Vandalism, Otherwise
Vandalism is the act of intentionally and malevolently modifying or destroying something. (anything)
For an example of vandalism, click here
When in Rome, do as the Vandals do.
— Napoleon Bonaparte, Napoleon, Vandalism