Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DJ Clayworth (talk | contribs) at 15:59, 22 January 2004. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello

I don't know if you realize that your edits are not showing up as by you. You've got to be logged in for them to show up under your user name not the IP address you're using. Since you seem to be working from a lot of different IPs, this is important.

You also get access to useful features like section editing, the "this is a minor change" checkbox, and watch lists if you make sure to log in first.

-- Zack 22:19, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)

Hi ChrisO :) I hope you like the place and choose to stay.

Some links that may be of use:

• Misplaced Pages:Welcome, newcomers
• Misplaced Pages:How to edit a page
• Misplaced Pages:Village pump - ask questions you may have here, or leave a message on my talk page

Scientology

By the way, your last change to Scientology removed valid content and was biased to one point of view - which is against Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view policy. We have to represent all points of view here :)

Thanks, and keep contributing! Dysprosia 01:20, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC)

I've moved the comment to my talk page, and replied to your concerns at Talk:Scientology. Dysprosia 01:43, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to the Scientology articles. In general, the editing here on Misplaced Pages is pretty much free-for-all, except for when edit wars break out. There are a number of folks keeping an eye on the Scientology articles, and I guess you've seen by now that this particular subject is very sensitive to some. (No, really?!?)

When I'm tired of looking at flames and serious stuff about anti-Semitism and the like, I find it relaxing to go and edit fun subjects for a change of pace. --Modemac 00:04, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Vinca alphabet

Thanks for getting involved in Vinca alphabet. Secretlondon 15:07, Dec 13, 2003 (UTC)

Binational solution

I left a note on Talk:Binational solution. I hope you will contribute to more mideast articles as your knowledge of it appears uncommonly deep. --Zero 12:49, 21 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Macedonia

Macedonia is not FYROM ---Vergina 09:38, 1 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Kosovo

Hi I'd just like to say youre re-write of the Kosovo War article is impressive. I've been saying it should be re-written for a long time G-Man 00:46, 3 Jan 2004 (UTC)

You've removed Albanian placenames from Kosovo, Pristina and Racak incident. Please don't delete the alternative Albanian names for Kosovo and its communities - the names are internationally recognised as valid and (obviously) are used in Kosovo itself. We have a similar issue in the UK and Ireland, which is resolved in Misplaced Pages articles by giving both the anglicised and the Gaelic or Welsh version of placenames (see for instance Dublin (Baile Átha Cliath) or Cardiff (Caerdydd)). In the same way, both Serbian and Albanian versions of placenames should be given in articles about Kosovo localities. -- ChrisO 11:14, 9 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Yes, I've removed them and will remove them again. Alternative names are where they should be - at the top of respective articles, from where I will never remove them. Alternative Albanian name for Kosovo is at the top of Kosovo and Metohia article, alternative name for Pristina is at the top of Pristina article, and alternative name for Racak should be at the top of Racak article when it is created. But there is no need to put alternative names whenever they are mentioned, or parhaps you think that I should put Belgrade (Beograd in Serbian) wherever Belgrade is mentione, Yugoslavia (Jugoslavija in Serbian) wherever Yugoslavia is mentioned, Serbia (Srbija in Serbian) wherever Serbia is mentioned, China (中國 in Traditional Chinese, 中国 in Simplified Chinese) wherever China is mentioned... By the way, these are not Albanian names, but Serbian names in Albanian language. I don't see enough paralells between Kosovo and Wales, and think that this decision was also wrong (but won't remove them as I don't care that much). I also don't see that names are "internationally" (regardless of what it means) recognised as valid. Nikola 08:48, 10 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I don't propose to put the alternative Albanian name for Kosovo at the top of every Kosovo-related article - I agree that would be unnecessary, and I've not done it on the articles about Kosovo towns - but I think it does need to go in the major history and political articles on the subject. This currently includes Kosovo and Kosovo War. On the same principle, if anyone was to do a separate article on Kosovo before 1912, it would be appropriate to give the alternative Turkish and Italian-derived names for the province (e.g. Kossovo, Cassovo). However, where individual towns are discussed in articles specifically about Kosovo (i.e. not simply mentioned in tangentially related articles) it is certainly appropriate to provide the alternative forms, as happens with Celtic placenames. (Incidentally, the English versions of Welsh, Irish and Scottish placenames are usually anglicisations of Celtic originals.) -- ChrisO 11:35, 10 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Why? Nikola 07:57, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Sorry, why what? I don't understand. -- ChrisO 10:15, 11 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Why it does need to go in the major history and political articles on the subject? By the way, I've noticed that the situation here is the complete opposite of the situation with Celtic placenames - there you are putting English versions of Celtic placenames and aside them original Celtic names - while here you are putting English versions of Serbian placenames and aside them Albanian versions of Serbian placenames. Nikola 07:10, 12 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. As I'm sure you know, the question of naming in Kosovo is very contentious - using exclusively one version or the other would be a POV (rather like the clash over the name of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia). If we're to be evenhanded, I think we need at least to acknowledge the existence of both versions. Also, you say that the Serbian placenames are actually given as English versions. Should there be diacritical characters in them or are they wrongly spelled? I've been relying on the list at http://www.osce.org/kosovo/documents/reports/hr/part1/l_serb.htm -- ChrisO 17:01, 14 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I noticed you included the less obvious pre-conflict stuff in the Kosovo War article -- something the page badly needed. Thanks, a lot of it will be recyclable for use in the History of Yugoslavia article. --Shallot 00:47, 16 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Misinformation

Dear Misinformator: Wearing your underpants on the outside is fighting against basic principles of supervillism! :) --MIRV 20:49, 10 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Bolshevik amendments

Please take a look at my recent proposal in Talk:Bolshevik Cautious 16:41, 14 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Shining Path

Very useful improvements to Shining Path this afternoon; you seem very well informed on the subject. I hope that user:Lancemurdoch stops insisting on calling them the PCP. Perverse if you ask me! -- Viajero 19:17, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for your note on my Talk page earlier today. I posted a lengthy reply to you and Kewertii apropos of use of the term "terrorist" on my talk page. -- Viajero 23:58, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Chris

I've added a comment at Talk:List of countries involved in World War II that you might be interested in. DJ Clayworth 15:59, 22 Jan 2004 (UTC)