This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MarionTheLibrarian (talk | contribs) at 10:41, 12 July 2008 (→Biological Origins of Sexual Orientation?: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 10:41, 12 July 2008 by MarionTheLibrarian (talk | contribs) (→Biological Origins of Sexual Orientation?: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
LGBTQ+ studies Start‑class | |||||||
|
Blanchard may have supported re-listing of SRS, but only if the Clarke was the only gatekeeper. I'd put this in the entry, but I cannot find a source.74.12.155.220 07:04, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality website != WP:RS
reverted edit: National Association for Research & Therapy of Homosexuality website is not an WP:RS. Pete.Hurd 05:47, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Biological Origins of Sexual Orientation?
I have again removed the claim that Blanchard studies the 'biological origins of sexual orientation.' This expression does not suggest simply that there are biological influences on sexual orientation, which is most likely correct, but rather that sexual orientation has exclusively biological causes, which is most likely not correct and certainly not supported by any kind of scientific consensus. Skoojal (talk) 00:23, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that we should directly wikilink to the actual name of our article here. Jokestress (talk) 00:24, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't feel strongly about it, so I won't revert it again. Nonetheless, the sentence as it stands is poorly written. To say that one studies X and Y is to imply that one studies two different fields rather than their intersection. It would be more accurate and less ambiguous to say that Blanchard studies "the role of biological factors in the development of sexual orientation." Moreover, the name of the article, "biology and sexual orientation" was a poor choice. A more accurate name would be "biology of sexual orientation" or "biological basis of sexual orientation."
—MarionTheLibrarian (talk) 10:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC)