This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cumulus Clouds (talk | contribs) at 18:56, 21 July 2008 (Undid revision 226949176 by Inetpup (talk) - that has nothing to do with this case. stop readding it.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:56, 21 July 2008 by Cumulus Clouds (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 226949176 by Inetpup (talk) - that has nothing to do with this case. stop readding it.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)User:TheYieldCurve
- Suspected sockpuppeteer
TheYieldCurve (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppets
LogIn2CreateAccount (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
CumvIvs CIouds (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
MaxweIISmarter (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
206.53.144.25 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
216.9.250.114 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
various other IPs
- Report submission by
Cumulus Clouds (talk) 22:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Evidence
This is pretty open and shut, this account registered after questions were made about the edits of the IP to IndyMac Bank, which removed sources from that article. TheYieldCurve then registered and removed the same sources as the IP had done earlier. A comment on the page of that user was subsequently removed, and the IP left a comment on my talk page followed by a comment as their user account. The IP would later remark in an edit summary about the sockpuppetry notice left on the talk page of TheYieldCurve and their comments on mine, which I removed. User:LogIn2CreateAccount then registered and began restoring the refactored comments. Once these were removed again, the IP followed suit.
Ditto on User:CumvIvs CIouds and User:MaxweIISmarter
- Comments
Yes, this is an open-and-shut case. All user accounts are clearly the same person, and all should be indef-blocked. It might be worthwhile to do a checkuser to find if there are sleepers or if this is an established user in disguise. Yechiel (Shalom) 19:44, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
- Conclusions
Please everything void!