This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nishkid64 (talk | contribs) at 13:44, 24 July 2008 (→Featured article reviews: Listing Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Hydrochloric acid.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:44, 24 July 2008 by Nishkid64 (talk | contribs) (→Featured article reviews: Listing Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Hydrochloric acid.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Reviewing featured articles Shortcuts
This page is for the review and improvement of featured articles (FAs) that may no longer meet the featured article criteria. FAs are held to the current standards regardless of when they were promoted. There are three requisite stages in the process, to which all users are welcome to contribute. 1. Raise issues at the article's talk page
2. Featured article review (FAR)
3. Featured article removal candidate (FARC)
The FAR and FARC stages typically last two to three weeks, or longer where changes are ongoing and it seems useful to continue the process. Nominations are moved from the review period to the removal list, unless it is very clear that editors feel the article is within criteria. Given that extensions are always granted on request, as long as the article is receiving attention, editors should not be alarmed by an article moving from review to the removal candidates' list. To contact the FAR coordinators, please leave a message on the FAR talk page, or use the {{@FAR}} notification template elsewhere. Urgent reviews are listed here. Older reviews are stored in the archive. Table of Contents – This page: Purge cache, Checklinks, Check redirects, Dablinks |
Featured article candidates (FAC): Featured article review (FAR): Today's featured article (TFA):
Featured article tools: |
Nominating an article for FAR The number of FARs that can be placed on the page is limited as follows:
Nominators are strongly encouraged to assist in the process of improvement; they should not nominate articles that are featured on the main page (or have been featured there in the previous three days) and should avoid segmenting review pages. Three to six months is regarded as the minimum time between promotion and nomination here, unless there are extenuating circumstances such as a radical change in article content.
|
Featured article reviews
Hydrochloric acid
previous FAR (12:46, 12 September 2008)
Eifel Aqueduct
previous FAR (11:34, 26 August 2008)
Iowa class battleship
previous FAR (12:57, 19 August 2008)
The Cantos
previous FAR (11:34, 26 August 2008)
Battle of Hampton Roads
previous FAR (13:25, 20 August 2008)
Taiwanese (linguistics)
previous FAR (13:25, 20 August 2008)
Her Majesty's Most Honourable Privy Council
previous FAR (13:18, 13 September 2008)
Helen Gandy
previous FAR (10:07, 25 August 2008)
Military history of Canada
previous FAR (17:20, 18 August 2008)
Objectivist poets
previous FAR (17:20, 18 August 2008)
December to Dismember (2006)
previous FAR (14:09, 19 August 2008)
Featured article removal candidates
- Place the most recent review at the top. If the nomination is just beginning, place under Featured Article Review, not here.
San Francisco – Oakland Bay Bridge
previous FAR (17:20, 18 August 2008)
History of Limerick
previous FAR (11:33, 29 August 2008)
Ahmedabad
previous FAR (22:44, 10 August 2008)
Jerusalem
previous FAR (13:21, 7 August 2008)
Paragraph 175
previous FAR (13:21, 7 August 2008)
Helium
previous FAR (08:39, 5 August 2008)
Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9
previous FAR (10:38, 1 September 2008)
Polish-Muscovite War (1605–1618)
previous FAR (12:55, 26 July 2008)
1896 Summer Olympics
previous FAR (13:21, 7 August 2008)
Excel Saga
previous FAR (12:55, 26 July 2008)
Butter
previous FAR (17:20, 18 August 2008)
Isaac Brock
previous FAR (08:39, 5 August 2008)
The Supremes
previous FAR (17:20, 18 August 2008)
Category: