This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Delldot (talk | contribs) at 15:05, 31 July 2008 (→Attachment theory: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:05, 31 July 2008 by Delldot (talk | contribs) (→Attachment theory: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
| Thanks for dropping me a note! Don't be shy about asking questions, I'm always glad to help. I will reply to messages here, so you may want to watchlist this page. |
| If you'd like to undo an action of mine and can't get a hold of me within a reasonable time, go ahead. If I disagree, we can discuss it when I'm back. This applies to admin actions too. |
Thanks again for your help with nuthatch. jimfbleak (talk) 05:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- No probs, you certainly earned that star this time! Congrats Jimfbleak. What's your next conquest? :P delldot talk 05:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
List of Iowa county courthouses
hello! do me a favour and look at this list: list of Iowa county courthouses.looks deletable to me, but ,again, i can't decide under what criterion. it doesn't really contain any info other than that each courthouse is located in the county of the same name. seems like one sentence in a list of counties would pretty much cover it. comme toujours, merci et paix. Toyokuni3 (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- I would take it to AfD with WP:NOT#DIR and notability concerns. I would expect the only sources you'd find for this would be primary (or trivial; hence the notability concern). It looks like it may be a work in progress, so you may want to ask the author(s) about their plans and request citations. I can take it to AfD myself if you like, but I'm going to bed now and may not be around much tomorrow. Another good catch Toyokuni, I see you've been keeping that fine Wikipedian instinct sharp! Peace, delldot talk 05:14, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
RfA Thanks
A message from Steven Fruitsmaak.
|
AI-Wikipage again - deletion or Afd, are these the only options
Hello delldot.
I have got some proposals for speedy deletion or Afd from Skomorokh and Triwbe. I feel I am being manipulated a bit, what is your opinion? - I would like you to say a word in the debate on my talk page if you have time, see http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Anna_Quist#The_debate
(Anna Quist (talk) 18:55, 27 July 2008 (UTC))
Message to Delldot, Maxim and Triwbe about cooperation to improve the AI-Wiki-page
As you well know, the AI-Wiki-page is once more deleted, this time by Bjweeks on a request from Hoary. I have written to them at their talkpages about cooperation to achieve an AI-Wiki-page that has general Wiki-consent, before publishing it again. Copies of these messages are on my talk page. Take a look at them. As AI is the largest anarchist-network in the world, it of course should have a Wiki-page. I invite you all to contribute to a better AI-Wiki-page for later publishing. This time so good that it will not be deleted by anyone. (Anna Quist (talk) 16:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC))
- Sorry to hear it was deleted after all that work you put in. But if you recall, I've told you several times what I thought it needed in order not to be deleted (inline citations to reliable, third party sources), and you went ahead with the move to the mainspace without it. I assume this is because it wasn't possible to provide: the reliable sources don't cover the group substantially enough to back up the claims made in the article. I think you should wait until the organization has been substantially covered in more sources. If it's really notable, it won't be long before newspapers and other reliable sources cover it. Peace, delldot talk 16:07, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Copyright again
i have an interesting and useful tidbit for you. if a print piece was published prior to 1978, without copyright notice, it is considered to be in the public domain. neat, huh? see : Editing Image: Bovet August 1944.jpg] i give up. anyway, that's where it is .Toyokuni3 (talk) 22:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Interesting, I didn't know that. Where is that? Or is it reevery country? delldot talk 22:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Jabba here
I've done some copyediting on PTE, and left another laundry list... Should be almost there by now. JFW | T@lk 10:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Attachment theory
Hey! The peer review got archived! Is that automatic or something. Fainites 14:39, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's done by a bot, they just don't want it taking up so much space on the WP:PR page or it would never load for people with slow connections. I would carry on editing the page as normal, or you can maybe add the link to the page back to WP:PR (not transcluded though). At this point you're more likely to get reviews from people you ask anyway, so I don't see why having it on the main PR page would help much anyway. If you want you can un-archive it on the talk page, but I would just carry on. (Note that I don't actually know what I'm talking about, this is just my instinct). Let me know when you're ready for more input! Peace, delldot talk 15:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)