Misplaced Pages

Satanic ritual abuse in the Netherlands

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WLU (talk | contribs) at 15:37, 13 August 2008 (Reports of satanic ritual abuse: whitespace, fixes, one section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 15:37, 13 August 2008 by WLU (talk | contribs) (Reports of satanic ritual abuse: whitespace, fixes, one section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

In the Netherlands satanic ritual abuse was discussed briefly during two occasions: the publication of the research into the reliability and validity of dissociative identity disorder of Nel Draijer and Suzette Boon and the publication of the report of the Werkgroep Ritueel Misbruik.

Multiple personality disorder in the Netherlands

From 1984 to 1985 psychiatrists Bennett Braun, Roberta Sachs and Richard Kluft held workshops in the Netherlands about dissociative identity disorder (DID) and presented their clinical experiences with cult survivors. A small group of Dutch psychotherapists began diagnosing many of their patients with as suffering from DID and alleging that some of these patients had developed this mental disorder due to childhood satanic ritual abuse.

Oude Pekela

A few years later the idea of satanic ritual abuse had found its way to the conservative religious community in the Netherlands. In 1989 some parents alleged in newsmagazine Tijdsein published by the religious broadcasting company Evangelische Omroep that their children had witnessed satanic ritual abuse in school and that children were ritually abused in Oude Pekela in 1987. In that case only non-ritual abuse was reported then to the authorities, who were not able to find any proof of the allegations. According to Tijdsein, the parents, as well as psychiatrist Gerrit Mik, who examined 25 of the 70 allegedly abused children in Oude Pekela, told the investigating officers about the ritual slaughter of children and adults, but the authorities in Oude Pekela have denied that. Several of the children had been diagnosed by Oude Pekela general practitioners Fred Jonker and Ietje Jonker-Bakker, who stated the children had been sexually abused by unknown men. Jonker and Jonker-Bakker gave a lecture at the Institute of Education of London University alleging that the children in Oude Pekela were both sexually and ritually abused, and published their allegations in several articles. but their findings were heavily criticised by American and Dutch scholars.

Reports of satanic ritual abuse

The Netherlands Justice Department was officially informed of the alleations in 1991 and in September, 1992 the Minister of Public Health and State Secretary of Justice were informed by the Youth Protection Inspectorate that the youth protection agencies in the provinces Noord-Holland and Utrecht had reported satanic ritual abuse of eleven juveniles. Neither agency took steps based on this information until the allegations were reported in the media. At that point the State Secretary of Justice appointed a multidisciplinary workgroup to study SRA in the Netherlands, producing a report titled "Werkgroep Ritueel Misbruik". The report concluded that it was unlikely SRA had occurred or the allegations were factually true, suggested the allegations were a defence mechanism produced in part by suggestive questioning by 'believing' therapists, and ultimately concluded the stories were contemporary legends dispersed through a network of therapists and patients who were concerned with dissociative identity disorder.

References

  1. ^ Boon, Suzette and Nel Draijer, Multiple Personality Disorder in the Netherlands: A Study on Reliability and Validity of the Diagnosis, Amsterdam/Lisse, Swets en Zeitlinger, 1993.
  2. Werkgroep Ritueel Misbruik, Rapport van de Werkgroep Ritueel Misbruik, Den Haag, Ministerie van Justitie, Directie Staats- en Strafrecht, April 1994.
  3. Boon, S (1988). "Dissociëren als overlevingsstrategie bij fysiek en seksueel geweld: Trauma en dissociatie 1". Maandblad Geestelijke volksgezondheid. 43 (11): 1197–1207. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Beetstra, T A (2004). "Massahysterie in de Verenigde Staten en Nederland: De affaire rond de McMartin Pre-School en het ontuchtschandaal in Oude Pekela". Mediahypes en moderne sagen: Sterke verhalen in het nieuws. Leiden, Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden. pp. 53–69. {{cite book}}: |format= requires |url= (help); External link in |chapterurl= (help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl= ignored (|chapter-url= suggested) (help); Unknown parameter |editors= ignored (|editor= suggested) (help)
  5. Jonker, F. (1991). "Experiences with ritualist child sexual abuse: a case study from the Netherlands". Child Abuse and Neglect. 15: 191–196. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(91)90064-K. PMID 2043971. Retrieved 2007-10-20. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  6. Jonker F & Jonker-Bakker I (1994). "Onderzoek in Oude Pekela". Maandblad Geestelijke volksgezondheid. 49 (3): 251–276.
  7. Merckelbach HLGJ, HFM (1996). Hervonden herinneringen en andere misverstanden. Contact, Amsterdam/Antwerpen Contact. pp. 183–186.
  8. Putnam, F.W. (1991). "The Satanic Ritual Abuse Controversy". Child Abuse and Neglect: The International Journal. 15 (3): 175–79. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(91)90062-I. Retrieved 2008-06-10.
  9. Wessel, I (1994). "Onderzoek in Oude Pekela (2)". Maandblad Geestelijke volksgezondheid. 49 (5): 554–6. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  10. ^ Fauwe, L (1993-06-12). "Ritueel misbruik van kinderen voor satan". Het Parool.
  11. Aanhangsel tot het Verslag der Handerlingen van de Eerste/Tweede Kamer der Staten-General, vol. II, 1992–1993{{citation}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  12. ^ Werkgroep Ritueel Misbruik (1994), Rapport van de Werkgroep Ritueel Misbruik, Den Haag: Ministerie van Justitie, Directie Staats- en Strafrecht, pp. 65–66  in Dutch
Category: