This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Miquonranger03 (talk | contribs) at 05:58, 14 September 2008 (→Re:warn on opium: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:58, 14 September 2008 by Miquonranger03 (talk | contribs) (→Re:warn on opium: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Browser problems
Does it happen in all of your browsers? -- Scarpy (talk) 03:09, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
AA copyright
Appreciate the info.Linda,LCADC (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Promenade Pictures
Why didn't you notify me of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Promenade Pictures as the template calls for? Corvus cornixtalk 23:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
The only reason I found it was because I happened to be looking through the AfD page. Corvus cornixtalk 00:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chris Musni
Thanks for your feedback on my article and your statement of support. Misplaced Pages is fun and educational and I am enjoying being part of the community. I appreciate your making me feel welcome. Gchuva (talk) 00:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for getting that.
I reverted the wrong change. -- Scarpy (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Re:warn on opium
That was due to an edit conflict, and I've restored your version. However, in the future, please, instead of templating me, just come to my talk page and ask why I did it. Even if it's blatant vandalism, instead of tarnishing my reputation with a misplaced warning template, ask me what happened. With a newer editor, obviously, revert and template. But with a more experienced user, especially one with over 9,000 mainspace edits, it's always better to bypass templates and see what went wrong. miquonranger03 (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)