Misplaced Pages

• complain, click here.
• ask me why I nominated an article you created for deletion, go here.
• ask me why I reverted your edit, go here.
• give me an award, click here.

• No drama.
• If you start a conversation here, I'll reply here unless you request otherwise.
• Be nice. Any uncivil comments will be reverted on sight. That means no cursing.
• Make a section header by clicking (a) the "new section" button on top of the page, (b) the "talk to me" button to the right, or (c) by clicking here. I can keep track of messages easier.

1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 • 9 •10

Moderators, please take notice.

I'm a long time user of Misplaced Pages and recently started to contribute by adding relevant and usefull information to the pages. My first two attempts were to add a few usefull links to the page "Concept Design". But unfortunately my contributions to the page are constantly being deleted by the moderator Jonathan and refered to my contribution as VANDALISM!

I did not take away any of the information that was on those pages, I have merely ADDED information. The additions that I made to the page are usefull links to a few online pages that give information and show samples about the subject Concept Design. The contents of the links that I added are directly relevant to the subject matter, they give more information and show insight about the art. And by no means should they be considered out of place or vandalism! I do not appreciate that some moderator unrightfully accuses me of vandalism when all I am doing is to be a contributor of Misplaced Pages. Misplaced Pages's purpose is to allow others to contribute by sharing information gathered by users. If moderators delete contributions and don't allow postive information to be adde to Misplaced Pages by the users, then the moderators are cuting down and detering the information value of the pages.

I ask the moderator(s) (Johnathan) to please re-consider thier actions. If you as a moderator/administrator are able to correctly review the changes I've submitted to the Concept Design page, then you will see that my contribution is appropriate and 100% related to the subject matter of the page that it is on. Again, I added relevant information (did not delete any of the previous info that was already there) and the edits I have made adds to the information value of the page Concept Design and should not be deleted.

Thanks,

H.G.G.A.

Paul Malignaggi

What's the big idea reverting in the Paul Malignaggi article? 202.69.189.29 (talk) 22:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Personality Psychology fix

Hi, you and user:Superflewis keep reverting Personality Psychology to a state in which all of its content is duplicated a bunch of times, despite my attempts to fix the problem. Why are you doing this? (talk) 18 September 2008 —Preceding undated comment was added at 01:31, 19 September 2008 (UTC).

Please review WP:AGF

Your recent listings for vandalism included an editor adding a hang on tag , , please take time to review the policy and the edits before submitting vandalism. Jeepday (talk) 01:36, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

And you may be interested in this: RxS (talk) 02:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

You reverted the user 5 times, including the addition of a {{hangon}} tag. I can't even begin to describe how inappropriate this is. I've revoked your rollbacker rights. Mr.Z-man 02:46, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Scott Slutzker and User:Mookman23

I concur with Mr Z-man in revoking rollback. It's sad you did not look more closely and act more helpfully. It would have been far more helpful to realize that Mookman's intent was to contest the speedy deletion, add the hangon for him, and politely explain to him that that was all that was needed. Even more significant, the article asserted notability form the start. I would urge that you exercise greater caution in the future, that you try not to bite the newbies, and that you apologize to Mookman on the off chance you haven't run him off. Dlohcierekim 04:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Did not realize this was a different incident. Dlohcierekim 04:06, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Huh?

Why the retirement bud? how do you turn this on 21:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Oh, what a shame... well hopefully you'll change your mind... how do you turn this on 23:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:NickelodeonPNGlogo.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:NickelodeonPNGlogo.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Misplaced Pages's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 05:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)