Misplaced Pages

:Featured article candidates/Kaunas Fortress/archive1 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Novickas (talk | contribs) at 13:22, 29 September 2008 (/* Kaunas Fortress - rply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:22, 29 September 2008 by Novickas (talk | contribs) (/* Kaunas Fortress - rply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Kaunas Fortress

Nominator(s): M.K. (talk)
Toolbox

Kaunas Fortress is already a good article, it also got an A-class rating from military department. Article is topical, as it covers the history of the largest and best preserved originally Russian Empire's fortress. Article is written using newest academic research on the subject, richly illustrated with pictures, both contemporary and present, article is stable and comprehensive. I think article meets all FA criteria. M.K. (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Support as nominator, M.K. (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
As the principle contributor and nominator, your support is assumed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:57, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

The writing needs ironing out throughout: here are examples of why, just from the top.

  • The link to redoubt is good, but it's a very unusual term and our readers shouldn't have to divert, as I did, to learn the basic meaning; could you gloss it in a brief phrase? Are we meant to know about some grading hierarchy for fortress? I'm mysified.
  • "... obsolete; after , it was used only for c p and as a g." (Two different ideas are currently blurred into the one sentence.)
  • The "Some ..." sentence: there are two "ands" in it, so insert a comma after the first one.
  • Infobox: what does "from 19th century end" mean? And why just "1915"?
  • No comma after "Vilnius" (the use of commas throughout clearly needs an audit).
  • Vague and a bit wordy: "During the course of the city's history"—why not give us a century range?
  • Why is the growth of the city suddenly relevant, and stuck at the end of the para? Is it population or economic or what? Tony

(talk) 15:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Otherwise sources look good, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note that I was unable to check the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Regarding dead links - I will investigate them. M.K. (talk) 21:08, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
I removed dead links, last two works now. M.K. (talk) 21:54, 27 September 2008 (UTC)