Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SPW (talk | contribs) at 09:32, 29 September 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Template:Ido Language Ido is a constructed language, arguably the second-most used International Auxiliary Language in the world. It was developed in the early 1900s, and still has a small following today, primarily in Europe. It is largely based on Esperanto, created by L. L. Zamenhof. Ido first appeared in 1907 as a result of a desire to reform perceived flaws in Esperanto that its supporters believed to be a hindrance in its propagation as an easy-to-learn second language. Many other reform projects appeared after Ido such as Occidental and Novial appeared afterwards but have since faded into obscurity, and at present Ido, along with Esperanto and Interlingua are the only auxiliary languages with a large body of literature and a relatively large speaker base. The name of the language may have its origin in the Ido pronunciation of "I.D." (from "International Delegation", see below) or the word ido, "descendant (of Esperanto)".

Ido uses the twenty-six latin letters used in the English alphabet with no diacritics. While still being completely gramatically regular, Ido resembles Romance languages in appearance and is sometimes mistaken for Italian or Spanish at first glance. Ido will be largely intelligible for those who have studied Esperanto as well, though there are certain differences in word-formation, grammar and grammatical function words that make it more than a simple reform project, and Ido is a stand-alone language. After its inception Ido gained wide support (estimates generally range around 30%) from the Esperanto community at the time, and since then with the sudden death of one of its proponents, Louis Couturat in 1914, further schisms through other reform projects as well as a lack of awareness of Ido as a candidate for an international language weakened the movement further, and it was not until the rise of the internet that Ido began regaining its previous momentum.

Comparison with Esperanto

Ido inherits many of the same grammatical features of Esperanto, and in many cases the vocabulary is similar. Ido shares with Esperanto the goals of grammatical simplicity and consistency, ease of learning, and the use of loanwords from various European languages. The two languages, to a great extent, are mutually intelligible. However, certain changes were introduced to address some of the concerns that had arisen about Esperanto. These include:

• Esperanto's alphabet uses six non-Latin letters, three of which are not found in any other existing language; as a result, Esperanto in typing and in internet e-mail and newsgroups frequently resorts to any of several schemes to represent these special letters. This leads to the situation where the same word may be displayed any of several different ways. Ido addresses this issue by using the 26-letter Latin alphabet, with two digraphs "ch" (/tS/) and "sh" (/S/). qu represents /kw/, as in English "quick", is used instead of Esperanto kv, and likewise gu is used instead of gv. Ido orthography is phonetic in the sense that each written word has an unambiguous pronunciation, but it does not have the one-to-one correspondence between letters and phonemes that Esperanto has.

• For reasons of grammatical simplicity, Ido generally does not impose rules of grammatical agreement between grammatical categories within a sentence, since these are redundant. For example, in Esperanto, the verb in a sentence is invariable regardless of the number and person of the subject. But this principle was not extended in Esperanto to adjectives and nouns; as a result, in Esperanto, an adjective must agree in number and case with the noun it modifies. There is no such requirement in English, for example, where number is emphasized by variation of the verb, and Ido eliminates this feature from its grammar.

• Esperanto requires the use of the -n ending to signify the use of the accusative case. Ido allows the use of this feature in ambiguous situations where the object of a sentence does not follow the subject, but in all other situations the accusative case was eliminated as redundant.

• Ido imposes consistent rules on the use of endings to transform a word from one meaning or part of speech to another, thus simplifying the amount of vocabulary memorization that is necessary.

• Ido, unlike Esperanto, does not assume the male sex as the default for family relationship words, and thus does not, for example, derive the word for "sister" by adding a feminine suffix to the word for "brother", as standard Esperanto does. Instead, some relationship root words are defined as sex-neutral, and two different suffixes derive masculine and feminine specific words from the root (frato (sibling) > fratulo (brother), fratino (sister)). In other cases, Ido has two or three root words where Esperanto has one (genitoro (parent), patro (father), matro (mother)).

• The Ido vocabulary attempts to use cognates that are shared in common by as many of its source languages as possible.

Phonology

Ido has the same typical five-vowel system (a, e, i, o, u have their IPA values) as Esperanto, and most of the same consonants, omitting two consonant phonemes used by Esperanto, IPA /x/ and /dʒ/. (The distinctions between /x/ : /h/ and between /dʒ/ : /ʒ/ carry a very low functional load in Esperanto, and so were deemed to be unnecessary in Ido.)

The accent rule in Ido is regular, but slightly more complex than that of Esperanto: all polysyllables are stressed on the penultimate syllable except for verb infinitives, which are stressed on the ultimate syllable - skolo, kafeo and lernas for 'school', 'coffee' and 'learn', but irar, savar, and drinkar for 'to go', 'to know', and 'to drink'.

Grammar

Each word in the Ido vocabulary is built from a root word. A root word consists of a root and a grammatical ending. Other words can be formed from that word by removing the grammatical ending and adding a new one, or by inserting certain affixes between the root and the grammatical ending. As with Esperanto, Ido is grammatically invariable; there are no exceptions in Ido, unlike in natural languages.

Some of the grammatical endings are defined as follows:

These are the same as in Esperanto except for -i, -ir/-ar/-or and -ez. Esperanto marks noun plurals by an agglutinative ending -j (so plural nouns end in -oj), uses -i for verb infinitives (Esperanto infinitives are tenseless), and uses -u for the imperative.

Pronouns

The pronouns of Ido were revised to make them more acoustically distinct than those of Esperanto, which all end in i. Especially the singular and plural first person pronouns mi and ni may be difficult to distinguish in a noisy environment, so Ido has me and ni instead. Ido also distinguishes between intimate (tu), formal (vu) second-person singular pronouns and plural second-person pronoun (vi), not marked for intimacy. Furthermore, Ido has an epicene third-person animate pronoun lu in addition to its masculine (il), feminine (el), and inanimate (ol) third-person pronouns.

¹ tiu, although not a pronoun, is often used in this circumstance.

The Ido speaker community

The vast majority of Ido speakers find out about the language after learning about Esperanto, and so the percentage of Idists who know Esperanto is much higher than vice-versa. The largest number of Ido speakers are in the countries of Germany, France, and Spain, though there seem to be at least a few Ido speakers in most countries of the world.

It is also necessary to distinguish between the number of Ido speakers and Ido supporters. Ido resembles Esperanto, and many Esperantists have learned Ido out of curiosity while still not using it, preferring to support the more well-known Esperanto movement instead. It is possible to find tri-lingual discussions on the internet in English, Esperanto and Ido, each understanding the other with little problem.

A number of Esperantists viewed the schism of Ido as a mixed blessing and a number of writings show that some were inversely glad to see those who were interested only in creating a perfect language by constantly reforming it leave the fold so that those remaining could work on using and promoting the language itself. However, these 'constant reformers' eventually moved on to other reform projects, none of which survived much beyond the deaths of the authors themselves, and Ido has remained constant since then - it is safe to say that were Ido a community of language reformers during its early days, that this is not the case anymore.

Language Example

Chapter 17 of The Little Prince; the conversation between the Little Prince and the snake upon his arrival on Earth. The title of the Ido-language version is La Princeto.

CHAPITRO XVII

(...)

–Bona nokto ! –dicis la surprizata princeto.

–Bona nokto ! –dicis la serpento.

–Adsur qua planeto me falis ? –questionis la princeto.

–Adsur Tero, sur Afrika. –respondis la serpento.

–Ha !... Kad esas nulu sur Tero ?

–To esas la dezerto, e nulu esas sur la dezerti. Tero esas tre granda –dicis la serpento.

La princeto sideskis sur stono e levis lua okuli a la cielo.

–Me questionas a me –lu dicis- ka la steli intence brilas por ke uladie singlu povez trovar sua stelo. Videz mea planeto, olu esas exakte super ni... ma tre fore !

–Olu esas bela planeto –dicis la serpento-. Por quo vu venis adhike ?

–Esas chagreneto inter floro e me –dicis la princeto.

–Ha ! –dicis la serpento.

E la du permanis silence.

–Ube esas la personi ? –klamis fine la princeto-. Onu esas kelke sola sur la dezerto...

–Inter la personi onu anke esas sola –dicis la serpento.

La princeto regardis la serpento longatempe.

–Vu esas stranja animalo ! –dicis la princeto-. Vu esas tam tenua kam fingro...

–Yes, ma me esas plu potenta kam fingro di rejo –dicis la serpento.

La princeto ridetis.

–Me ne kredas ke vu esas tre potenta, mem vu ne havas pedi... nek vu povas voyajar...

–Me povas transportar vu plu fore kam navo -dicis la serpento.

Ed olu spulis la maleolo di la princeto, same kam ora braceleto.

–Ta quan me tushas retroiras a la tero deube lu venis. Ma vu esas pura e vu venas de stelo...

La princeto nulon respondis.

–Me kompatas vu, qua esas tante sola sur ta harda granita Tero. Me povas helpar vu se vu sentas nostalgio a vua planeto. Me povas...

–Ho ! –dicis la princeto-. Me bone komprenis, ma pro quo vu sempre parolas enigmatoze ?

–Me solvas omna enigmati –dicis la serpento.

E la du permanis silence.

Averto lektenda

La verko La princeto licencesas sub Creative Commons License, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode

Autoro.- Fernando Tejón, krayono@yahoo.es

Ret-pagino.- http://es.geocities.com/idohispania/laprinceto/laprinceto.html

History

The request by the Delegation for the Adoption of an International Auxiliary Language to the International Association of Academies in Vienna to select an international language was rejected in May, 1907. The Delegation, which had been founded by Louis Couturat, decided to meet as a Committee in Paris in October 1907 to discuss the adoption of a standard international language among the various competitors that had been devised up to that time. According to the minutes of the Committee, it decided that no language was completely acceptable, but that Esperanto could be accepted "because of its relative perfection and because of the many and diverse applications already received by it, on condition of several modifications to be realized by the permanent Commission in the direction defined by the conclusions of the Report of the Secretaries (Couturat and Leopold Leau) and by the Ido project" which later had been presented to the Committee as an anonymous project. The Ido project has later been suggested to have been primarily devised by Couturat with some help from Esperanto's representative before the Committee, Louis de Beaufront. Beaufront had himself argued for reforming Esperanto prior to having been selected to the Delegation, and during the proceedings he argued in favor of Esperanto over other languages; his "conversion" to the Ido camp upon the presentation of that language was thus consistent with his earlier positions.

Early supporters of Esperanto tended to resist reforms, and the language's inventor, L. L. Zamenhof deferred to their judgement. Ironically, several of the reforms adopted by Ido were themselves proposed at various times by Zamenhof, especially in 1894 when he proposed eliminating the accented letters and the accusative case (referring to it as "superfluous ballast" ), changing the plural to an italianesque -i, and replacing the table of correlatives with more latinate words (see History of Esperanto). The custom of keeping the basic rules of Esperanto fixed remains today. Couturat, who was the leading proponent of Ido, was killed in an automobile accident in 1914, which, along with World War I, dealt a serious blow to the Ido movement. Although that movement recovered to some degree in the immediate postwar period, the whole movement of international languages became Balkanized as a result of Couturat's death. The publication of an even more Europeanized planned language, Occidental, in 1922 began the process of splintering the community, and the Ido movement lost a majority of its published periodicals in the subsequent year or so, and the defection of its major intellectual supporter, the Danish linguist Otto Jespersen, in 1928 on the occasion of the publication of his own planned language Novial, seemed at the time to provide a quietus.

However, the language still has a few speakers today, and the internet has sparked a renewal of interest in the language in recent years. The estimates of the number of speakers range from 250-5000. In comparison, Esperanto has at least a hundred thousand, with 1.6 million speakers estimated by a retired psychology professor named Sidney S. Culbert, who conducted a survey of speakers of several world-wide languages. Culbert's figure appears in the Almanac and World Book of Facts, and in Ethnologue.

Jespersen, who was present during the ten days of Committee deliberations in Paris and later served as part of the permanent Commission, wrote a history of Ido.

Many Esperanto supporters have attacked Ido over the years. One of them, Don Harlow (see Don Harlow in the Esperanto Misplaced Pages), wrote a history of Ido in the third chapter of The Esperanto Book, "How to Build a Language". Some have criticised the validity of his history, to which he replies in a subchapter, "Ido: The Beginning". However, most Ido partisans argue that Harlow's history does not jibe with all the eyewitness accounts, such as those reported by Jespersen, although it is based on material from some other eyewitnesses such as Emile Boirac and Gaston Moch and with some source documentation, to which Harlow claims Jespersen did not have access (such as Zamenhof's correspondence with Couturat and others during the period).

Literature and publications

Ido has a number of publications that can be subscribed to or downloaded for free in most cases. The majority of Ido publications are comprised mostly of material about various subjects, with a few pages within on the status of the movement and news on upcoming gatherings. Kuriero Internaciona is a magazine produced in France every few months with a range of topics. Adavane! is a magazine procuced by the Spanish Ido Society every two months that has a range of topics as well as a few dozen pages of work translated from other languages. Progreso is the official organ of the Ido movement and has been around since its inception. Other sites have various stories, fables or proverbs along with a few books of the bible tranlated into Ido on a smaller scale.

Recent International Ido Conventions

Toulouse will host a convention from the 23rd to the 27th of September, 2005.

2004: Kiev, Ukraine - 17 participants from 9 countries (Raporto)
2003: Grossbothen, Germany - Participants from 6 countries (Raporto)
2002: Kraków, Poland - 14 participants from 6 countries (Raporto)
2001: Nuremberg, Germany - 14 participants from 5 countries (Raporto)
1998: Białobrzegi, Poland - 15 participants from 6 countries
1997: Bakkum (mun. Castricum), Netherlands - 19 participants from 7 countries
1995: Elsnigk, Germany
1991: Ostend, Belgium - 21 participants
1980: Namur, Belgium - 35 participants
1960: Zürich, Switzerland - ca. 50 participants

External links

History and opinions on Ido

• Langmaker.com about Ido
• Page about the Ido language
• Otto Jespersen's history of Ido
• Another history of Ido
• Don Harlow's "How to Build a Language", the section about Ido
• Don Harlow's "Ido: The Beginning"
• Emile Boirac's "Report to the World Esperanto Congress, 1908" about his experiences as part of the Delegation's Committee
• Léopold Leau's "The Truth About the Delegation in 1907", a rebuttal of criticisms made about the events of the Delegation, based on his own experiences as a member of the Delegation
• Ido-Pagino da Ailanto - Some discussion about Ido, and links to websites, organizations, mailing lists, courses, dictionaries, grammars, e.c.

Pages in Ido and places to learn the language

• Ido Wiktionary
• Kompleta Gramatiko Detaloza di la Linguo Internaciona Ido (PDF), in HTML, again in HTML
• North American Ido Society
• Blueprints for Babel: Ido - Commentary and grammatical summary of Ido, with glossary and links
• "Ido for All", a course for English speakers, can be found here and here. A partial translation into French, "Ido pour tous!", can be found here. Companion MP3 files for lessons 1 through 7 can be found here.

Ido
Language Grammar Phonology Union vs. Esperanto vs. Interlingua vs. Novial
HistoryBeaufront Couturat Jespersen Delegation for the Adoption of an International Auxiliary Language
Related Auxiliary language Constructed language Esperanto Esperantido Adjuvilo
Wikimedia Wikipedio Wikivortaro
v t e

• Ido
• International auxiliary languages
• Esperantido