This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CorenSearchBot (talk | contribs) at 06:58, 6 October 2008 (Notifying user of possible copyvio on The Keating Five Scandal). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:58, 6 October 2008 by CorenSearchBot (talk | contribs) (Notifying user of possible copyvio on The Keating Five Scandal)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Please feel free to leave your comments below. Thanks, Ret.Prof (talk)
Deletion discussions
Hi Ret.Prof, when contributing to deletion discussions, you need to leave a reason for why the article should be kept or deleted. For example, here, why should the article be kept and expanded? Thanks, Somno (talk) 02:40, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
...
October 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Keating Five has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 06:51, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
The Keating Five Scandal
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Keating Five Scandal, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Keating Five. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)