This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Moonriddengirl (talk | contribs) at 11:14, 11 October 2008 (→List of television stations in North America by media market: entering conversation). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 11:14, 11 October 2008 by Moonriddengirl (talk | contribs) (→List of television stations in North America by media market: entering conversation)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Browser problems
Does it happen in all of your browsers? -- Scarpy (talk) 03:09, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
AA copyright
Appreciate the info.Linda,LCADC (talk) 17:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Promenade Pictures
Why didn't you notify me of Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Promenade Pictures as the template calls for? Corvus cornixtalk 23:19, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
The only reason I found it was because I happened to be looking through the AfD page. Corvus cornixtalk 00:07, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Chris Musni
Thanks for your feedback on my article and your statement of support. Misplaced Pages is fun and educational and I am enjoying being part of the community. I appreciate your making me feel welcome. Gchuva (talk) 00:55, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for getting that.
I reverted the wrong change. -- Scarpy (talk) 16:44, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Re:warn on opium
That was due to an edit conflict, and I've restored your version. However, in the future, please, instead of templating me, just come to my talk page and ask why I did it. Even if it's blatant vandalism, instead of tarnishing my reputation with a misplaced warning template, ask me what happened. With a newer editor, obviously, revert and template. But with a more experienced user, it's always better to bypass templates and see what went wrong. miquonranger03 (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- You might be surprised how far people will dig in editor review and RfA. miquonranger03 (talk) 06:19, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Battle of Chawinda
Hey Advocate hope your well i need some help regarding the article on Battle of Chawinda recently a pro indian editor Nichalp has reverted the page putting his pro india stance in the war info box claiming Pakistan only repelled the attack while the article clearly states india lost the battle which is started the page was stable for several months but since Nichalp has arrived its been changed from Decisive Pakistan victory to Pakistan repelled the attack could you please change it to its neutral factual base please cheers 86.153.131.220 (talk) 10:27, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
PAK
sorry to bother you again but a editor named kashmircloud has reverted the neutral edits on PAK and added his pro india edits in the article he seems to be pushing only his pro indian POV by diverting the articles name into POK and misleading readers so can you do anything to block or warn him and stop him from vandalising PAK article again cheers 86.156.214.251 (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
2002 NFL Expansion Draft FLC
I have removed the {{FLC}} template from Talk:2002 NFL Expansion Draft because the process was not completed. If you would like to nominate the article, then please follow the "Nomination procedure" instructions at {{FLC-instructions}}. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 14:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Hope you notice that I added more comments to the FLC.--SRX 02:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Request for Rollback
Hiya. I've granted your request. Please see WP:RBK for instructions on use or feel free to ask me! Pedro : Chat 07:32, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for Image:6313.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:6313.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Misplaced Pages's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Misplaced Pages can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot 15:23, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- Note that I have listed this image for deletion, it was uploaded with an incorrect filename, and reloaded with a correct filename.--User:2008Olympianchitchat 22:34, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
Image:6313.gif listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:6313.gif, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. 2008Olympian chitchat 20:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
List of television stations in North America by media market
I am unsure as to why you have marked this as a CopyVio. As it stands most of the templates have been remade (that link to that list) with non-Nielsen information. Nielsen doesn't own a list on Misplaced Pages, they own the information and why the lists are made, but not a list on Misplaced Pages. I ask that you bring this before WP:TVS, the TV Station WikiProject for more input. - NeutralHomer • Talk • Work • October 6, 2008 @ 03:17
- I am requesting the US "markets" be removed from the list as this is a list for NORTH AMERICA and Nielsen doesn't control all of North America markets (or any of the US markets, IMO). - NeutralHomer • Talk • Work • October 8, 2008 @ 04:04
- Exactly what is the WP:CP department doing with this list exactly? The list has sat on WP:CP's page for almost 6 days with no one action taken. I'm not understanding what the point in that is. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 11, 2008 @ 04:10
- I don't understand why this article has the copyright violation tag either? I thought this issue was already resolved. I also agree that only the U.S.A part should be removed. Nielson doesn't have anything to do with Mexico, Canada, or other parts of North America. Joeloliv8 05:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- What Joeloliv8 touched on, and the "powers that be" are understanding" is that the copyvio would only fall on the US section, not the entire page. If you delete the entire page, that is overstepping bounds and giving authority where it doesn't belong. Nielsen has no control over Mexican, Canadian, or Caribbean areas. If it so requires (and I still think it doesn't) removal of the US information and ONLY the US information would be necessary. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 11, 2008 @ 06:16
- As I am seeing little, if any, action being taken in this department I have removed the US information, so that the copyright "blockade" template can be removed (which I also removed) and the information for Canada, Mexico and other North American areas outside the US and US Territories can be viewed. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 11, 2008 @ 06:24
- What Joeloliv8 touched on, and the "powers that be" are understanding" is that the copyvio would only fall on the US section, not the entire page. If you delete the entire page, that is overstepping bounds and giving authority where it doesn't belong. Nielsen has no control over Mexican, Canadian, or Caribbean areas. If it so requires (and I still think it doesn't) removal of the US information and ONLY the US information would be necessary. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 11, 2008 @ 06:16
- I don't understand why this article has the copyright violation tag either? I thought this issue was already resolved. I also agree that only the U.S.A part should be removed. Nielson doesn't have anything to do with Mexico, Canada, or other parts of North America. Joeloliv8 05:33, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- Exactly what is the WP:CP department doing with this list exactly? The list has sat on WP:CP's page for almost 6 days with no one action taken. I'm not understanding what the point in that is. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 11, 2008 @ 04:10
←Hi. :) The WP:CP department (insofar as I seem to be one of the few people in it) have been trying to get a definitive answer on this issue. I'm loathe to delete something without being certain that it should be deleted, but I'm not removing the copyright tag until I know that it's not affected by the takedown. That could get get us in trouble. :/ I have sought feedback at WP:AN, from two different admins involved with the first run of deletions and finally here, where I was sent from AN. It seems pretty likely that I'm not getting a further response. If the List of television stations in North America by media market has been addressed, fabulous. List of TV markets and major sports teams in the United States should be rewritten by the Census Bureau's MSAs, it seems. If one of you can to tell me what that means or how to do it, I'd be happy to get it off the queue. I hate having things hang around unresolved. :/ --Moonriddengirl 11:14, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
1969 NFL Draft
As I've been reprimanded for this before I'll just make note to you that Wikilink's should not be duplicated within an article as you did with the 1969 NFL Draft article / table / list. I have since repaired the edit/s. Please only wikilink first instance or first instance of importance. Happy editing Slysplace 01:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding the expansion draft pages, put them on your watch list. I hit those a few days ago, or at least formated your tables for you. Not knowing the format your going for or how much data you wish to include I did not want to go too much further. Slysplace 21:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
- I thought that I had all of them watched, but evidently I didn't. Great start on the 1961 table. The one that is by far the most complete is the 2002 NFL Expansion Draft article, it is currently undergoing a feature list review. I guess if I had a format, that would be my model? Although I am open to anything that is uniform across all the draft pages and gets them feature list status eventually. I love football season... :) --User:2008Olympianchitchat 01:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- You should reduce the use of abreviations in the 2002 article, likewise you should set the table widths to 100%. I wont edit 2002 if it's under review but I did do some additional editing to the 1961 vikings article. Also I (personaly) think the alternating colors in the table headings are a bit to much you really should use 1 color for text the other for background like you did in the 61 expansion / vikings page ... just my 2 cents Slysplace 01:46, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- The table was at 100%, but a FLC reviewer suggested otherwise. If you would post a comment on the FLC page as to making it 100%, that would help me get a consensus as to how to set the table. I tried a similar color scheme to what was on the Vikings page, but red on dark blue was too hard to read, whereas yellow on purple looked great. On the 1995 and 1976 pages, I used the colors of the two teams that were on the draft.--User:2008Olympianchitchat 03:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- You should reduce the use of abreviations in the 2002 article, likewise you should set the table widths to 100%. I wont edit 2002 if it's under review but I did do some additional editing to the 1961 vikings article. Also I (personaly) think the alternating colors in the table headings are a bit to much you really should use 1 color for text the other for background like you did in the 61 expansion / vikings page ... just my 2 cents Slysplace 01:46, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
- I thought that I had all of them watched, but evidently I didn't. Great start on the 1961 table. The one that is by far the most complete is the 2002 NFL Expansion Draft article, it is currently undergoing a feature list review. I guess if I had a format, that would be my model? Although I am open to anything that is uniform across all the draft pages and gets them feature list status eventually. I love football season... :) --User:2008Olympianchitchat 01:34, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Regarding the expansion draft pages, put them on your watch list. I hit those a few days ago, or at least formated your tables for you. Not knowing the format your going for or how much data you wish to include I did not want to go too much further. Slysplace 21:41, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tampa Bay Buccaneers helmet leftface.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Tampa Bay Buccaneers helmet leftface.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:25, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- It was used, but then I replaced it with a better image in 1976 NFL Expansion Draft.--User:2008Olympianchitchat 15:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)