Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nishkid64 (talk | contribs) at 00:14, 15 October 2008 (→ResearchEditor: CU results.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

ResearchEditor

• ResearchEditor (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Extrabreeze (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Albigolow (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: ResearchEditor (aka Abuse truth (talk · contribs) aka Abuse t (talk · contribs)) is topic-banned from Satanic ritual abuse articles (see his talk page). Recently a couple of SPAs have turned up at the SRA page, pushing exactly the same POV as Abuse truth did, and with suspicious knowledge of Misplaced Pages policy and terminology (Extrabreeze's first edit summary refers to a "cfork"). I call bullshit, and would like to have this CU-confirmed. Meatpuppetry I am convinced of: socking is perfectly plausible. If the former, I'll deal with this via revert restrictions: if the latter we can move straight to blocking. Moreschi (talk) 14:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
• Albigolow (talk · contribs) is  Unrelated.  Possible that ResearchEditor (talk · contribs) = Extrabreeze (talk · contribs), based on geographical similarities.  Likely that ResearchEditor = Baawip80 (talk · contribs), same home ISP from same city. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Clerk note: I have indef blocked Extrabreeze (talk · contribs) seeing as the contributions confirm they are ResearchEditor. After looking over Baawip80 (talk · contribs) I see nothing that would indicate they are involved. Also, I am going to leave ResearchEditor unblocked, but recommend a ANI thread be started to discuss any possible violations of the above stated topic-ban. Tiptoety 18:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

As I mentioned on the talk page of the relevant entry, can you check out the following two users against all those listed above as well so we can clear the air completely regarding new single purpose accounts pushing RE's POV post ResearchEditor's topic ban.

• 68.6.140.88 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Attafire (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Thanks.PelleSmith (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

IP  Unrelated.  Confirmed that Attafire (talk · contribs) = Previewriver (talk · contribs) = Raorino (talk · contribs). Highly  Likely that they are all ResearchEditor (talk · contribs) – same home ISP in same town. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Clerk note: After looking over Baawip80 (talk · contribs) a bit more, I have indef blocked that account as well. Tiptoety 22:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)