Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.5.165.32 (talk) at 05:34, 4 October 2005. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Two deals cut in contested United States presidential elections have been known as Corrupt Bargains.

1824

In the election of 1824, none of the candidates were able to secure a majority of the electoral vote, thereby putting the outcome in the hands of the House of Representatives, which (to the surprise of many) elected John Quincy Adams over rival Andrew Jackson. Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House at the time, and he convinced Congress to elect Adams. Adams then made Clay his Secretary of State. Some people believe that an agreement was made ahead of time between the two, a Corrupt Bargain.

1876

The election of 1876 is sometimes considered to be a second Corrupt Bargain. Four Southern states had contested vote counts, and for either candidate to win the election, he would need more electoral votes. In Congress, an agreement was made: Rutherford B. Hayes, the Republican candidate, would be elected under the following conditions:

• Hayes's cabinet would include one Southerner.
• The Union troops would withdraw from the South.
• A policy of noninterference from Hayes.
• Reconstruction would be declared finished.

With the Union troops gone, there was no security that the South would uphold the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments, so African-Americans were not guaranteed to be free. Hence, it was called a Corrupt Bargain. Many historians call this "The Great Compromise of 1876".

• U.S. political history