This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Pjacobi (talk | contribs) at 19:17, 6 October 2005 (User:Lightbringer's additions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:17, 6 October 2005 by Pjacobi (talk | contribs) (User:Lightbringer's additions)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)A Critical View of the so-called 'Taxil Hoax'
User:Lightbringer tries for some time to augment the article with a very different view of the subject. I've reverted earlier attempts for clearly failing editing guidelines. The last attempt is a good deal better, but - even when considering only the formalia - not good enough. Perhaps other editors can help improving it (and decide what's worth saving). Of Lightbringer himself is invited to discuss the points here.
The most strinking formal point:
- Quite a bit of the addition gives information about Léo Taxil, contradicting our current article. This part should be removed from here and discussed at Talk:Léo Taxil. I assume it would need some reference before claiming he was a free mason.
- About the half of the additions, starting with The theological dogma of Albert Pike is explained in the 'Instructions' issued by him, is not related at all with the subject of this article. Please bring it to the relevant articles.