This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Christopher Parham (talk | contribs) at 23:17, 11 November 2008 (cmt.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:17, 11 November 2008 by Christopher Parham (talk | contribs) (cmt.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Augustan literature
- Users notified: Geogre, Bishonen, Portal:England
This article fails 1c and 2c of Misplaced Pages:Featured article criteria
- Criteria 1(c) factually accurate: claims are verifiable against reliable sources, accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge, and are supported with specific evidence and external citations; this requires a "References" section in which sources are listed, complemented by inline citations where appropriate;
Although there is a list of References at the bottom of the article, they are not specific to statements claimed. Some of the statements seem to be personal opinion or the opinion of a particular group, but not necessarily representative of various opinions given their due weight as in NPOV. The article can be seen as a scholarly essay representing a particular view or evaluation of the subject of the article.
- Criteria 2c: :consistent citations—where required by Criterion 1c, consistently formatted inline citations.
This article was promoted in 2005 when the standards were more lenient. —Mattisse (Talk) 21:18, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- What statements do you believe require inline citation? Christopher Parham (talk) 23:17, 11 November 2008 (UTC)