Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Scientology and sex (2nd nomination) - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cirt (talk | contribs) at 19:48, 25 November 2008 (c/e). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:48, 25 November 2008 by Cirt (talk | contribs) (c/e)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Scientology and sex

AfDs for this article:
Scientology and sex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Original research based almost exclusively on primary sources and without so much as a secondary source establishing notability for this (supposed) sub-topic of Scientology. Justallofthem (talk) 19:17, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. There are actually WP:RS/WP:V secondary sources given in the article itself already, including:
    • Cooper, Paulette, The Scandal of Scientology, Chapter 3, "Life and sex in the Womb"
    • Malko, George, Scientology: The Now Religion, Chapter 5
    • Robert Kaufman, Inside Scientology/Dianetics, pt.1
    • See also news, books, scholar
This is certainly a subject that has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and should be kept and expanded upon with additional info from other secondary sources, and the info reliant solely upon primary sources should be pruned - but AfD is not the correct venue to discuss that. Cirt (talk) 19:35, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
Categories: