Misplaced Pages

User talk:Conductcode

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Seraphimblade (talk | contribs) at 09:20, 2 December 2008 (Your request: Then if it needs editing, edit away!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 09:20, 2 December 2008 by Seraphimblade (talk | contribs) (Your request: Then if it needs editing, edit away!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Hello, Conductcode, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. —EqualRights (talk) 13:37, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

November 2008

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Prostate has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Spencer 01:21, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Your request

Could you please provide a link to the page to which you are referring, and what part of it you're referring to? Context would be very important here, there's really not a blanket answer to that. I'd be happy to have a look at the specific instance you're talking about. Seraphimblade 18:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Can't view it, there seems to be some kind of Javascript ad before you get to the article and I can't seem to click past. Is there any indication that the source you're referring to is reliable at all? Seraphimblade 08:14, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Then if you believe it needs editing, by all means, go ahead! If you feel the edit may be controversial, it's likely best to leave an edit summary with a short description of what you are doing and why, and if someone disagrees, to take up discussion on the talk page. Seraphimblade 09:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)