Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Shrampes (talk | contribs) at 23:37, 2 December 2008 (→User:Highfructosecornsyrup: let's move on). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

User:Highfructosecornsyrup

Suspected sock puppeteer

Highfructosecornsyrup (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

Suspected sock puppets

• Shrampes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · tag · block user · block log · CheckUser)

See also accounts from the checkuser case cited below:

• Wikipediatrix (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Terryeo (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), and others.

Report submission by

• Cirt (talk) 21:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Evidence

• Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Highfructosecornsyrup
• Highfructosecornsyrup was active on Scientology-related articles: Special:Contributions/Highfructosecornsyrup, as is Shrampes:
• Shrampes edits articles related to username of Highfructosecornsyrup:
• After being inactive for over a year , Shrampes appears makes a flurry of edits, and proceeds to comment in a Topic Ban Proposal discussion related to User:Shutterbug on Scientology-related articles and the ArbCom case Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/COFS. Cirt (talk) 21:18, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments

• Note: Shrampes notified, Highfructosecornsyrup already blocked indef. Cirt (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Whoa, hey, Cirt? Highfructosecornsyrup turned out to be a sock of Wikipediatrix, who was duly chastised for it and had the sock indef-blocked. She apparently liked arguing with herself. But I seriously doubt she'd do it again. --GoodDamon 23:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

I did edit in Dianetics recently. And got attacked for adding a reliable source by an editor who seems to fulfill the WP:SPA description (99% scientology edits). A little research and I ended up on the Shutterbug/ArbCom page. Cirt's reaction confirms what I said there. Shrampes (talk) 23:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Note the edits to the article "High-fructose corn syrup", combined with the same POV and Scientology-focus as Highfructosecornsyrup (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 04:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

You are overdoing it, but I feel that there is nothing I can do to show you how wrong you are. Did the other editors get notified as well? Shrampes (talk) 23:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Conclusions