Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Akhilleus (talk | contribs) at 04:55, 14 December 2008 (→WP:CIV: irony). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bookmarks

articles ice fire emigration diffs and links bishzilla moods monobook warning templates removing warnings

Thank you

I just saw your kindly defence of me here what a joy to see that. The other customary accusations of eating babies, puppies, kittens and the black magic sacrifices I make before releasing a page into mainspace I can live with. Even the voodoo curses I enact on admins who block me - all true, but you my sweet spotted the lie. Thank you so much.

Love. Giano (talk) 15:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Oh, well, probably everybody spotted it and nobody else thought it worth refuting.. I was promptly advised on IRC against having a battle of wits with an unarmed man woman, by a user who is something of an expert on that subject, so I think I'll merely ignore if I see any more attacks on that kind of level. Bishonen | talk 15:56, 26 November 2008 (UTC).

Can Zilla come play?

Snow needed at talk:David Irving#Proposed move ϢereSpielChequers 17:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, Zilla isn't used to closing stuff, she doesn't know from the right templates and stuff. And she tends to get overenthusiastic with the roaring when she tries. I've given my opinion.. Sorry to be so useless on the closing front, and I hope you won't have any trouble locating another uninvolved admin. Bishonen | talk 17:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC).

No problem, User:Trusilver turned out to be a worthy Rouge admin and snowed it forthwith. I guess some of the fiddlier templates must be difficult to manipulate when you're 80 foot tall. ϢereSpielChequers 18:37, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Zilla forever waiting for her nail polish to dry these days, too. Bishonen | talk 21:38, 26 November 2008 (UTC).

SlimVirgin

Hiya Bishonen. It would've been cool, to have had my comments responded to by SlimVirgin herself (as they were meant for her). Anyways, I've scratched them out. Jeepers, I didn't wanna see her getting blocked either, ya know. Ya'll should learn to relax a little. GoodDay (talk) 20:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Having taken some deep breaths, I realize you probably meant well. I'm sorry I let the way you expressed yourself get under my skin. Bishonen | talk 20:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC).

No prob, I'm cool. GoodDay (talk) 20:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Not surprised your cool, with that hat you have been taking off all over the place today. Giano (talk) 20:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

I've got alot of hats. I only hope I can remember where I left them. GoodDay (talk) 20:32, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk pages with the most edits

As of October 2008. Dragons flight (talk) 21:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

• Haha! Eat your heart out, User:Giano! Bishonen | talk 21:20, 27 November 2008 (UTC).

Beware L'esprit de la Comtesse de Burgh...whooohooohoooschreeeeeeeeeechc Giano (talk) 22:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Is little Lady! Come sit in Spiderman suit pocket Lady C! Incidentally 'Zilla talkpage superior. Discriminating little users watch! bishzilla _ROARR!! 23:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC).

FT2

What exactly has FT2 done to warrant injunctions against him? I have heard claims several times, but no specifics of diffs. --Apoc2400 (talk) 22:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I suggest you see this evidence page by Peter Damian, especially the links towards the end of the page. Read from the section "My concerns about Misplaced Pages" to the end. Bishonen | talk 14:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC).

Do you feel we can trust Peter Damian, considering how many times he has been blocked from editing Misplaced Pages? -- Stating the Obvious (talk) 14:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

I'd rather not discuss my personal opinion of which of the two users is the more trustworthy; but I assume you're aware that some blocks are more well-founded than others. Anyway, if you follow my advice above and read the links on the page I refer to, you will see that they link chiefly to posts by FT2, not by Peter Damian. Considering those links, do you feel we can trust FT2? Bishonen | talk 15:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC).

Above comment was intended as sarcasm. -- Stating the Obvious (talk) 21:08, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

I haven't read it all, but all I understand from it is that PD doesn't like FT2, and I already knew that. Since I am looking for evidence of FT2 behaving badly towards PD, I went ahead to section "FT2 personal attacks", subsection "On Damian" with three links. shows FT2 asking that the case about unblocking PD should be taken on-wiki instead of secretly. That seems resonable if there is no private information given the complaints when ArbCom decides anything in secret. is FT2 presenting evidence against Hinnibilis (PD). I see nothing wrong there either. Did I miss some especially harsh word? is about HeadleyDown not PD, only "In fact, had Damian done his work, he would have found the following existing pages". --Apoc2400 (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Arghh.. I'm sorry, I don't mean to sound impatient, but I just don't have the time or inclination to re-read and pick out exerpts from those long posts. I have stuff to do. Here's one example, which I think you may have missed, from each post on"FT2 personal attacks": 1),"a hostile, defamatory, banned user", 2), "Some comments above are a little economical with the truth, I fear." (Not "an especially harsh word', no: just a roundabout way of saying "you're lying"..) 3), "bad-faith AFD," "little knowledge and minimal research" "proxy editing for a banned user." Ok, you have the links, I'm afraid you're on your own. (Incidentally,are you familiar with the show/hide feature? Click on "show" and see what happens.) Bishonen | talk 18:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC).

Thanks for watching out for me

It's nice to know others keep an eye :-). However, as it turns out, that charming IP editor is a longtime unregistered contributor who I suspect most admins would recognise under his old IP of 68.39.174.238. His dumb ISP caused a forced "rename" last week, so now he doesn't have his 23,000-edit history attached anymore. Poor guy, now all the hugglers and twinklers are going to start calling his edits "vandalism" again; I think the software programmers had put his old IP on the "ignore" list. Thanks again. Risker (talk) 01:43, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

Sleep

No.--Tznkai (talk) 16:10, 12 December 2008 (UTC)

WP:CIV

Please keep WP:CIV in mind when interacting with other editors. Being rude gets you nowhere, and won't convince anyone of your point of view. It does add blatherskite to people's vocabularies, granted, but that is hardly sufficient compensation for the ill will it creates. --fvw* 04:49, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

"Please keep WP:CIV in mind when interacting with other editors. Being rude gets you nowhere, and won't convince anyone of your point of view." Irony! --Akhilleus (talk) 04:55, 14 December 2008 (UTC)