This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ABF (talk | contribs) at 17:58, 18 December 2008 (→Your input...: yes, you're right, that was a good idea :)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:58, 18 December 2008 by ABF (talk | contribs) (→Your input...: yes, you're right, that was a good idea :))(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)This user scored 12799 on the Wikipediholic test (revision 254653407). |
Hi :)
|
---|
RfA thankspam
Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 61/52/7; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.
Special thanks go out to Wizardman and Malinaccier for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for the trust the community has placed in me. A special Christmas song for you all can be found at the right hand side of this message! Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Dendodge Talk, 17:16, 15 December 2008 (UTC) |
- Cool, thankspam including jingle bells :)))) abf /talk to me/ 15:19, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
Your input...
...will probably be greatly appreciated here, given that you apparently supported here. (And if you could translate that support, which appears to have been qualified support, that might be helpful to us as well.) Thanks! Frank | talk 17:12, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- I do not know if there should really be such mesages about RfA's, but okay, thank you. :) abf /talk to me/ 17:45, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- "Such messages"? I wasn't soliciting a particular point of view but rather the opinion of someone who's a member of both communities, therefore possibly having more insight on this particular candidate than most users of en-wiki. Thanks for responding! Frank | talk 17:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right, sorry and thanks again for the message wich was very appropriate. :) abf /talk to me/ 17:58, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
- "Such messages"? I wasn't soliciting a particular point of view but rather the opinion of someone who's a member of both communities, therefore possibly having more insight on this particular candidate than most users of en-wiki. Thanks for responding! Frank | talk 17:57, 18 December 2008 (UTC)