This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sky83 (talk | contribs) at 19:27, 22 December 2008 (→Comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:27, 22 December 2008 by Sky83 (talk | contribs) (→Comments)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| Skip to table of contents |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 December 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Eoghan Quigg article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
Comments
Why Should this be deleted and he is Already so Famous... This should be kept because a lot of people who have heard about him may well want to know about his personal life and what he has done. i also think you should make a JLS Page as they are also pritty famous
- You should probably address the issue on the deletion page. Cheers, This flag once was reddeeds 18:35, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
I just want to say the result of the deletion of this article was extremely unfair. The other two contestents Diana Vickers and JLS pages were deleted for redirect. Why should he be treated any differently he is not famous yet, but the X factor is. Pic Editor 9686.157.104.50 (talk) 14:21, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- You're right, he shouldn't be treated differently, but with the result of the discussion being keep, JLS' article needs to be reinstated now. They placed higher, so there's really no argument to be had there. Diana too probably, but it depends on the definition of 'placed' in a music competition, since she was fourth and didn't make the final. I left a note about reinstating JLS on the talk page of here but I don't really have the time to do it myself, since it will probably need editing once it is reinstated. Sky83 (talk) 18:17, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Its already been done by User:Pyrrhus16. See JLS (Jack the Lad Swing). JS (chat) 18:40, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oh that's good, it wasn't back when I looked. Sky83 (talk) 19:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, I take that back. An admin has decided that it shouldn't be reinstated. Since Eoghen Quigg's article was voted a keep on the grounds that he placed in a music competition, this is blatantly a decision that needs to be looked at again since the only thing that distinguishes him from JLS is that he placed lower. IMO, it's totally nonsensical to have one article and not the other. I would give my support to anyone who wants to raise the point, but I can't really do it myself as I can only get on here for short periods at the moment as I am, like most people I imagine, busy over the holiday period! Sky83 (talk) 19:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Its already been done by User:Pyrrhus16. See JLS (Jack the Lad Swing). JS (chat) 18:40, 22 December 2008 (UTC)