This is an old revision of this page, as edited by CABlankenship (talk | contribs) at 01:40, 2 January 2009 (→Chomsky). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:40, 2 January 2009 by CABlankenship (talk | contribs) (→Chomsky)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, CABlankenship, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:54, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Deletions
I'm sorry I undid your edit. Please see the new talk page subsection I created on this matter. You very well may get your way on this matter yet, so don't throw up your arms in frustration prematurely. I just want to ask you some questions.Chrisrus (talk) 19:57, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
Ok, thank you. I think I have a good idea. Let's rewrite it backward, so that it starts with the crazy rant quote, moves to the partial concession, and then ends up with the complete acceptance. Do you see what I'm getting at? Chrisrus (talk) 16:01, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
Abrhm17
You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Misplaced Pages accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/User:CABlankenship. Thank you.
Vandalism
Do not remove the tag while the matter is under disputer, it is vandalism and is also subject to action including blocking by admin Kjaer (talk) 23:25, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Dispute has been resolved. Link was provided to page. Accuracy of quote was verified by abrhm17 (who you are now falsely accusing of being my sockpuppet) and a 3rd user. CABlankenship (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Nietzsche
Hey, great to hear I've bade a good impression on someone! And yes, I look forward to working with you. Like I have said before, the Nietzsche article has been in a sad state for awhile. With some work we may even make it a featured article. Zazaban (talk) 00:30, 2 January 2009 (UTC)