Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by WLU (talk | contribs) at 18:31, 8 January 2009 (more socking). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Possible ResearchEditor sockpuppets. All added the exact same information and citations to multiple pages using a series of throwaway accounts. The POV and sources suggest RE, promoting the discredited idea that there's any weight to the satanic ritual abuse moral panic, the use of the extreme abuse surveys (G4 speedied as a recreation of the Extreme Abuse Survey with an AFD here) and Randy Noblitt's discredited beliefs about satanic ritual abuse. All are single-purpose accounts that have only one topic's worth of edits, and redlinked talk and user pages. If it's not RE, then I would be very surprised, and even if not I can't concieve that it's not someone else sockpuppeting. If not RFCU-ed, accounts should probably be blocked anyway for spamming.

• Brewopco (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to physical abuse diff
• Turtleshell2go (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to torture diff
• Raspla42 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to moral panic diff
• Msbvben (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to Psychological trauma diff
• Donrus22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to brainwashing diff
• Reccaban2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to Psychology of torture diff
• Nmpras (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to Project MKULTRA diff
• Burgelt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) to religious abuse diff

• Tn25dog (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is the creator of the now deleted Extreme abuse surveys page, and may also be a sock.

That seems to be the lot. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/_complex 18:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

ResearchEditor

• ResearchEditor (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Extrabreeze (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Albigolow (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• Code letter: F

• Supporting evidence: ResearchEditor (aka Abuse truth (talk · contribs) aka Abuse t (talk · contribs)) is topic-banned from Satanic ritual abuse articles (see his talk page). Recently a couple of SPAs have turned up at the SRA page, pushing exactly the same POV as Abuse truth did, and with suspicious knowledge of Misplaced Pages policy and terminology (Extrabreeze's first edit summary refers to a "cfork"). I call bullshit, and would like to have this CU-confirmed. Meatpuppetry I am convinced of: socking is perfectly plausible. If the former, I'll deal with this via revert restrictions: if the latter we can move straight to blocking. Moreschi (talk) 14:29, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
• Albigolow (talk · contribs) is  Unrelated.  Possible that ResearchEditor (talk · contribs) = Extrabreeze (talk · contribs), based on geographical similarities.  Likely that ResearchEditor = Baawip80 (talk · contribs), same home ISP from same city. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 15:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Clerk note: I have indef blocked Extrabreeze (talk · contribs) seeing as the contributions confirm they are ResearchEditor. After looking over Baawip80 (talk · contribs) I see nothing that would indicate they are involved. Also, I am going to leave ResearchEditor unblocked, but recommend a ANI thread be started to discuss any possible violations of the above stated topic-ban. Tiptoety 18:26, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
•  Clerk note: After looking over Baawip80 (talk · contribs) a bit more, I have indef blocked that account as well. Tiptoety 22:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

As I mentioned on the talk page of the relevant entry, can you check out the following two users against all those listed above as well so we can clear the air completely regarding new single purpose accounts pushing RE's POV post ResearchEditor's topic ban.

• 68.6.140.88 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• Attafire (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Thanks.PelleSmith (talk) 22:25, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

IP  Unrelated.  Confirmed that Attafire (talk · contribs) = Previewriver (talk · contribs) = Raorino (talk · contribs). Highly  Likely that they are all ResearchEditor (talk · contribs) – same home ISP in same town. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 00:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

•  Clerk note: Confirmed accounts blocked. Tiptoety 01:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)