This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aitias (talk | contribs) at 01:32, 11 January 2009 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:32, 11 January 2009 by Aitias (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments
- Calorimetry in cold fusion experiments (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Yet another POV fork from Pcarbonn's attempts to boost cold fusion. Most of the rest were cleaned up some time ago, obviously this one got missed. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Cold fusion for the gory details. This gives undue weight to one aspect of a subject that is covered more neutrally by the day at cold fusion. Guy (Help!) 21:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly a content fork. No material worth merging into cold fusion article. -Atmoz (talk) 22:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete POV fork. Verbal chat 22:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:NPOV, redundant and biased version of cold fusion--Patar knight - /contributions 22:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
- Delete POV fork. Vsmith (talk) 00:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.