This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Highest-Authority-on-Joan-of-Arc-Related-Scholarship (talk | contribs) at 12:48, 29 October 2005 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 12:48, 29 October 2005 by Highest-Authority-on-Joan-of-Arc-Related-Scholarship (talk | contribs) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hi Durova! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Noisy | Talk 10:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
Joan of Arc
Welcome to the fray! You seem to have picked up that there has been significant dispute about this article in the past: be prepared for people to jump down your throat. Noisy | Talk 10:36, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- Your changes at Joan of Arc (either already made or suggested) are very much appreciated! Please edit boldly! As I mentioned at Talk:Joan of Arc#Tone this article should be polished to fit an encyclopedia. Be aware of AWilliamson, a self-proclaimed expert on Joan of Arc. He's a conservative catholic devoter of Saint Joan of Arc and a homo-phobe. He now acts under anonymous AOL-accounts and at least one sock puppet - HAJARS 22:08, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've just changed some suspisious edits by an anonymous user (from comparing his use of language, I believe it is AWilliamson) back to your version of the article. I know for sure he will revert them again. On that account it's an never ending story. Reading your edits, I'm convinced you are a true expert on the subject. HAJARS 22:55, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- I agree you've been very transparent. I wish you good luck on your effort to make the article more fitting an encyclopedia! — HAJARS 01:08, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Just take a look at this older version of the article and see how brief it could be... — HAJARS 23:22, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- As I expected, he changed my revisions of his edits again, just an hour ago. You can see his changes here: just look at the history chart of the article and compare selected revisions. There's no way to discuss this edit war with him. I invited him several times on the talk page, but as he won't log in there's no way to address him directly (and he doesn't respond to messages at his accounts AWilliamson and Center-for-Medieval-Studies) — unless you want to e-mail him. His e-mail address can be found at his site www.joan-of-arc.org. HAJARS 14:40, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- Just take a look at this older version of the article and see how brief it could be... — HAJARS 23:22, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
- I agree you've been very transparent. I wish you good luck on your effort to make the article more fitting an encyclopedia! — HAJARS 01:08, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
- I've just changed some suspisious edits by an anonymous user (from comparing his use of language, I believe it is AWilliamson) back to your version of the article. I know for sure he will revert them again. On that account it's an never ending story. Reading your edits, I'm convinced you are a true expert on the subject. HAJARS 22:55, 28 October 2005 (UTC)