Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jayen466 (talk | contribs) at 19:02, 1 February 2009 (→"Sect filters": +). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Scientology in Germany has had a difficult time achieving legal recognition. Various German courts have come to contradictory decisions on Scientology's status as a religion. The German government takes the view that Scientology is not a religion, and that its goals are in conflict with the German constitution. Scientologists in Germany are subjected to surveillance and discrimination. Germany has has been criticized over its stance towards Scientology, notably by the United States.

Legal status and court decisions

The status of Scientology in Germany is unresolved. Two points are contested: firstly, whether or not the teachings of Scientology qualify as a religious or ideological teaching, and secondly, whether or not these teachings are only used as a pretext for purely commercial activity; if the latter were the case, this would most likely imply that Scientology would not qualify for protection as a religious or ideological community under Article 4 of the German constitution.

In 1995, the Federal Labor Court of Germany took the view that the Church of Scientology does not represent a religious or ideological community entitled to protection under Article 4 of the German Constitution, but in 2003, in another decision, left this question open again.

The Federal Court of Justice of Germany has not yet made an explicit decision on the matter, but implicitly assumed in 1980 that Scientology represents a religious or ideological community. The Upper Administrative Court in Hamburg explicitly asserted in 1994 that Scientology should be viewed as an ideological community. The Administrative Court of Baden-Württemberg likewise does not endorse the view that the teachings of Scientology merely serve as a pretext for commercial activity. The Federal Administrative Court of Germany in 2005 explicitly granted a Scientologist protection under Article 4.1 of the German Constitution, which declares the freedom of religion inviolate.

In most legal cases, however, German courts have judged the status of Scientology to be irrelevant to their decision and have opted to leave the question open.

The German government has recently confirmed that it does not consider Scientology a religious or ideological community.

"Sect filters"

So-called "sect filters" are used against Scientologists, establishing discrimination against Scientologists in employment, as well as discrimination in political party membership. A sect filter requires an applicant to acknowledge membership in Scientology before being accepted for a position. German government agencies have drafted such sect filters for use by businesses, and various local governments operate so-called "sect commissioner's" offices.

A related controversy arose in 2000 when it became known that Microsoft's Windows 2000 operating system included code developed by Executive Software International, a company headed by a Scientologist. To assuage German government concerns, Microsoft Germany provided a means whereby the utility, a disk defragmenter, could be disabled.

Monitoring by the German intelligence services

Since 1997, Scientology has been monitored in some German states by the Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution), which takes the view that the aims of Scientology run counter to Germany's free and democratic basic order. In the city of Hamburg, the Scientology Task Force for the Hamburg Interior Authority also monitors the group. In April 1999, a German official was arrested in Switzerland and given a 30-day suspended jail sentence for spying on Scientology. The German government apologized to Switzerland for the incident. In December 2001, the Administrative Court in Berlin ruled against the Berlin Office for the Protection of the Constitution and ordered it to stop the recruitment and deployment of staff and members of the Church of Scientology Berlin as paid informants. The court ruled that the use of informants was disproportionate.

On a Federal level, Scientology lost a complaint against continued surveillance by the federal Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz because the court gave its opinion that there are indications that Scientology is pursuing anti-constitutional activities. In Berlin, the court prohibited the use of paid undercover agents. In Saarland, surveillance was stopped by the court as inappropriate because there is no local branch of Scientology and few members. As of 6 May 2008, the Church of Scientology in Germany dropped the legal battle to prevent surveillance of its activities by the Verfassungsschutz after the North Rhine-Westphalia Higher Administrative Court in Munster refused to hear an appeal on a ruling approving the intelligence services for monitoring the activities of the Church of Scientology. The Scientology organization has now added a declaration on human rights and democracy to its bylaws.

In March 2007, it was reported that Scientology had opened a new headquarters in Berlin, and that German authorities were responding by increasing their efforts to monitor Scientology. On December 7, 2007, German federal and state interior ministers expressed the view that the Scientology organization continues to pursue anti-constitutional goals and asked Germany's domestic intelligence agencies to collect and evaluate the necessary information that would be required for a possible judicial inquiry aimed at banning the organization. However, the move was criticized by politicians from all parts of the political spectrum, with legal experts expressing concern that an attempt to ban the organization would most likely fail in the courts. This view was echoed by the German intelligence agencies, who warned that a ban would be doomed to fail. In November 2008, Germany gave up on its attempt to ban Scientology, after finding insufficient evidence of illegal or unconstitutional activity. However, monitoring of Scientology's activities by the German intelligence services continues.

Criticism of German's stance

The U.S. Department of State has repeatedly claimed that Germany's actions constitute government and societal discrimination against minority religious groups – within which it includes Scientology – and regularly expresses its concerns over infringement of Scientologsts' individual rights. In June 2000, the U.S. House of Representatives held hearings concerning Germany's actions towards American Products based on religion and Scientology.

Germany's handling of Scientology has also been called into question before open hearings of the United Nations Human Rights Committee. A United Nations report in April 1998 agreed that individuals were discriminated against because of their affiliation with Scientology. However, it rejected Scientology's comparison of the treatment of its members with that of Jews during the Nazi era.

References

1. ^ bundestag.de: Legal questions concerning religious and ideological communities, prepared by the Scientific Services staff of the German Parliament Template:Languageicon
2. German Law Journal
3. BVerwG Az.: 7 C 20.04, 15 December 2005 Template:Languageicon
4. ^ U.S. Department of State – International Religious Freedom Report 2007: Germany
5. ^ Shupe, Anson (2006). Agents of Discord. New Brunswick (U.S.A.), London (U.K.): Transaction Publishers. p. 231. ISBN 0-7658-0323-2. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
6. Haddadin, Haitham (2000-11-06). Scientologist-software man blasts Germany, Independent Online
7. Report of the German federal Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz intelligence agency
8. Switzerland: Scientology Spying by a German Official Spurs Jail Term
9. Berlin Administrative Court Rules Against the Use of Undercover Agents Posing as Scientologists
10. Administrative court of Berlin, finding on 13. December 2001, file number: 27 A 260.98
11. Upper administrative court of Saarland, finding on 27. April 2005, file number: 2 R 14/03
12. AP via IHT
13. Stark, Holger (2007-03-27). "Scientology's New European Offensive: The March of the 'Orgs'". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 2007-11-12. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
14. ^ Scientology – Zweifel an Verbotsplänen, article in Tagesspiegel, 2007-12-8 Template:Languageicon
15. Sammlung der zur Veröffentlichung freigegebenen Beschlüsse der 185. Sitzung der Ständigen Konferenz der Innenminister und -senatoren der Länder am 7. Dezember 2007 in Berlin Template:Languageicon
16. Innenminister fordern Verbot von Scientology, article in Die Welt, 2007-12-8 Template:Languageicon
17. "Lack of Evidence: Agencies Warn Scientology Ban Doomed to Fail". Der Spiegel. 2007-12-10. Retrieved 2007-12-18. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
18. ^ Germany drops attempt to ban Scientology (AP)
19. ^ U.S. Department of State – International Religious Freedom Report 1999: Germany
20. Germany, Scientology and America, Washington Post, February 1, 1997
21. Frantz, Douglas (1997-03-09). "Scientology's Puzzling Journey From Tax Rebel to Tax Exempt". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-11-12. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
22. U.S. Department of State – International Religious Freedom Report 2005: Germany
23. U.S. Department of State – International Religious Freedom Report 2006: Germany
24. Discrimination on the Basis of Religion and Belief in Western Europe
25. Tank, Ron (1997-01-30). "U.S. report backs Scientologists in dispute with Germany". CNN. Retrieved 2007-11-12. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
26. Summary record of the first part (public) of the 1553rd meeting : Germany. 23/01/97. CCPR/C/SR.1553. (Summary Record). Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Geneva.

• Scientology by country
• Religion in Germany