This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ottava Rima (talk | contribs) at 18:36, 7 March 2009 (→The Lucy poems). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:36, 7 March 2009 by Ottava Rima (talk | contribs) (→The Lucy poems)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The Lucy poems
- Nominator(s): Kafka Liz (talk), Ceoil and Ottava Rima
- Featured article candidates/The Lucy poems/archive1
- Featured article candidates/The Lucy poems/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am conominating this for featured article with and Ceoil and Ottava Rima. We have worked long and hard on it, and I think it now meets Featured Article criteria. There is a peer review here. Thanks, Kafka Liz (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Comment: Re: "This includes Hunter Davies, who determined that the poems impact rely more on their popularity...". If I am reading the intent of this sentence correctly, and perhaps I am not, place an apostrophe after "poems" because the poems collectively possess "impact", and change "rely" to "relies" because "impact" is singular. Also, I am not sure it's absolutely correct to say he "determined" something "when he claims" it, as there does not appear to be clear cause and effect. -- Michael Devore (talk) 05:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- The use of "impact" would suggest a cause and effect relationship. Ottava Rima (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Note - I reworded the sentence, by the way. Ottava Rima (talk) 05:01, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
And thanks for the copy edit, Michael. Ceoil (talk) 19:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:41, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Tech. Review from Truco (talk · contribs)
- External links (toolbox) and ref formatting (WP:REFTOOLS) are found up to speed.
Dabs need to be fixed (toolbox).--₮RUCӨ 00:22, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks, but fear not; dab now fixed. Ceoil (talk) 00:44, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- ...are now up to speed as well.--₮RUCӨ 01:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Phew! Thanks. Although you review was generated by a script - no offence Truco - no support or opposed vote was offered, so thats ok. Ceoil (talk) 01:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- See my reasons on your talk page, and in addition, the dabs are in the toolbox, the only script I use is REFTOOLS.--₮RUCӨ 15:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Phew! Thanks. Although you review was generated by a script - no offence Truco - no support or opposed vote was offered, so thats ok. Ceoil (talk) 01:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- ...are now up to speed as well.--₮RUCӨ 01:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Image review - All images have sufficient descriptions and verifiable licenses. Sorry I didn't get a chance to review this article earlier. I'm finally doing so now. (It is funny to see my professors' names in the bibliography! Such a small world we live in.) Awadewit (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
- Lets pretend such people aren't connected to us, shall we. Otherwise, there are a lot of references that should probably be struck from many of these pages. :) Ottava Rima (talk) 18:36, 7 March 2009 (UTC)