Misplaced Pages

User talk:Axmann8

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Daniel (talk | contribs) at 08:25, 14 March 2009 (→The date is: {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}Please put your signature on additions to this page.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:25, 14 March 2009 by Daniel (talk | contribs) (→The date is: {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}Please put your signature on additions to this page.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The date is: December 29, 2024

Please put your signature on additions to this page.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Axmann8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:



I wish to appeal this block directly to the arbitration committee. I have tried

other methods of contesting this block (see below), but I am still dissatisfied with

the administrator conduct in this case. I am requesting respectful administrator

assistance to help me file this request, as I am unable to start an arbitration

request on my own.

Also, per WP:FAITH, WP:IAR, and WP:BOLD.


Decline reason:

Requests where a user is appealing a block or a ban to the Arbitration Committee must be done via email, as the user in question naturally is in no position to engage the arbitration process. See /Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee#Mailing_lists for more details on contacting the Committee. Daniel (talk) 08:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Axmann8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Fut.Perf. is absolutely violating my rights on Misplaced Pages. Did I edit the article? No. I provided an opinion that is truthful on a talk page. THe blocking administrator had absolutely no right whatsoever to prevent me from expressing my opinion in a talk page. The blocking administrator blocked me of his own political opinion, as is obvious, otherwise you would have not called it non-worthy of discussion (Which it is). I will most certainly be contacting other administrators, as well as stewards, to discuss your extremely inappropriate behavior here. I have the support of trusted members of the Misplaced Pages community to contest this block (see: User:Download and User:ChildofMidnight). I am furious that I was blocked when I showed no disregard for any Misplaced Pages policy. I gave my complete, honest opinion of what should be added to a Misplaced Pages article, on the article's talk page (which is my right as a member of Misplaced Pages with a significant number of GFDL-compatible edits, and many votes for AfDs (as you can see in my voting record). I should receive punitive compensation against Fut.Perf. for the time I have spent not able to edit Misplaced Pages, and for the time spent writing this appeal. The defense rests.

Decline reason:

Your edits to the talk page violate WP:BLP and WP:SOAPBOX. Making wild conspiratorial accusations, and labeling living people using names like "domestic terrorist" without any cause or justification is clearly a violation of WP:BLP. Polite discussion is encouraged at talk pages, even on the issue of Obama's citizenship, but the sort of polemic you left at the Barak Obama is clearly disruptive. It does not appear you are interested in building consensus via evidence or anything else, but you merely want to demand that your version of The Truth be accepted regardless of what mainstream publications and neutral sources say on the matter.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.