Misplaced Pages

User talk:Bircham

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by JzG (talk | contribs) at 13:08, 14 March 2009 (more). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:08, 14 March 2009 by JzG (talk | contribs) (more)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. To contest this block, please email me or place {{unblock|your reason here}} on your page, including an explanation why you feel you should be unblocked. This is due to threats and attempting to whitewash Bircham International University in violation of our neutrality policy. Many, many conversations over a very long period via OTRS and Misplaced Pages discussions have clearly failed to bring home the message: reaction to your university divides between ignoring it and considering it a diploma mill. You may not use Misplaced Pages to try to fix that. End of. Guy (Help!) 08:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

We will be quite happy to help correct provable errors of fact, as we have done in the past, but we will not offer any guarantee to interpret sources as you would wish to see them interpreted, nor will we allow you to dictate what weight is given to individual sources, nor will we interpret inclusion in a directory of any kind as asserting parity with other institutions in the same directory. The problem, simply stated, is this: Bircham appears to be marketing itself primarily to a US market, and in the US educational system accreditation is the primary benchmark. Your institution is listed as unaccredited and explicitly listed as unacceptable by numerous sources. The Misplaced Pages community cannot fix that. We may not, per our core policies and principles, help you to by airbrush those sources out. This has been explained to you patiently over many months byquite a few people but you do not seem willing to accept it; unfortunately that is your problem not ours. Please restrict all future comments to specific, actionable requests for correction of provable errors of fact supported by reference to reliable independent sources. Thank you. Guy (Help!) 13:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Category: