Misplaced Pages

:Featured article review/Restoration comedy - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article review

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Downstage right (talk | contribs) at 19:32, 15 March 2009 (Created page with '===Restoration comedy=== While this article's content is probably fine, it contains no inline citations, only a list of references at the end. The article was …'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:32, 15 March 2009 by Downstage right (talk | contribs) (Created page with '===Restoration comedy=== While this article's content is probably fine, it contains no inline citations, only a list of references at the end. The article was …')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Restoration comedy

While this article's content is probably fine, it contains no inline citations, only a list of references at the end. The article was promoted to FA status in 2004, when standards on referencing were much lower, and it would not pass muster today. Inline citations are necessary because the reader cannot be sure that all the information in the article really is supported by the books listed at the end. The article should not remain an FA unless this problem is rectified by knowledgeable editors.Downstage right (talk) 19:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)