Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Novruz in Azerbaijan - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Meowy (talk | contribs) at 21:22, 23 March 2009 (Novruz in Azerbaijan: Removed a bad-faith comment attacking an editor). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:22, 23 March 2009 by Meowy (talk | contribs) (Novruz in Azerbaijan: Removed a bad-faith comment attacking an editor)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Novruz in Azerbaijan

Novruz in Azerbaijan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

The article is a fork of the Novruz article and does not contain anything more than what is contained in the Novruz article. Novruz is not an event specific to Azerbaijan, and the term "Novruz in Azerbaijan" doesn't actually exist. There is no need to have country-specific entries for global festivals. For example, we do not have articles titled "Christmas in Germany" or "Easter in France" or "New Year in Spain", we just have entries for the actual festivals or holidays. Meowy 19:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

What distinct features? It doesn't seem to have any. Also, it is strange that for Iran, where the festival is of far greater importance both culturally and numerically, there is no need for a separate article. Yes, there IS a seprarate article for its celebration amongst Kurds - but they are an ethnic group, not a country, and for them it does have distinct features (its political and self-determination aspects). I'm not suggesting removing information, just questioning the need for an article that does nothing more than duplicate what is already in the main Novruz article. Maybe merge would have been a better proposal to make, but I felt that since it is already all in the main article, there wouldn't be much to merge. Meowy 17:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Green sprouts of samani with ribbon (not samanu), khoncha, which differs from Haft-Sin and so forth. Yet another thing I expected :) brandспойт 20:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Categories: