This is an old revision of this page, as edited by The Original Wildbear (talk | contribs) at 00:31, 29 March 2009 (→Arbitration enforcement: Unsubstantiated allegations.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:31, 29 March 2009 by The Original Wildbear (talk | contribs) (→Arbitration enforcement: Unsubstantiated allegations.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, The Original Wildbear, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Figma 20:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
9/11 conspiracy theories
The page you want is Misplaced Pages:No original research, which defines Misplaced Pages's rules on original research. Your edit took the (verifiable) facts of Bush's conduct regarding the 9/11 Commission and put them in an article regarding conspiracy theories, which implies that this is evidence of Bush having something to do with carrying out the attacks, a position which is not advanced by the original sources. This content would be better off in another article relating to 9/11 (some of it is already in Criticism of the 9/11 Commission). Hut 8.5 20:02, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- What you're talking about doesn't seem to be very relevant to the article on conspiracy theories, which is concerned about theories which allege that the U.S. government actually carried out the attacks (as opposed to theories which allege they were incompetent or tried to cover this up. As far as Misplaced Pages is concerned, a label like "conspiracy theorist" can only be applied if the term is commonly used by reliable sources such as newspapers, and this isn't the case with the idea that al-Qaeda were responsible. I suggest you take your concerns to an article talk page such as Talk:September 11 attacks and discuss with other editors there. Hut 8.5 20:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement
As you were warned immediately above, but continue the same pattern of disruption, I have started a thread at the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Jehochman 08:36, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- There was no warning, and the allegations were not substantiated. Case dismissed. The Original Wildbear (talk) 00:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)