Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KnightLago (talk | contribs) at 13:55, 6 April 2009 (→Scientology arbitration: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Derflipper, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -Razorflame (talk) 06:38, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you very much. I was and am active in the German Misplaced Pages, so not all is new to me. I like that the english Misplaced Pages is much more civil than the German! Derflipper (talk) 06:40, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

I find that implausible! ~ UBeR (talk) 23:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

Hä? Derflipper (talk) 00:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Scientology

Ich verstehe nicht, Ihre Kommentare über die Scientologie-Artikel; Sie sich nicht, weil damit klar ist, wie es ist defekt. Wenn meine deutsche Sprache besser war, würde ich Blick auf die gleichen Artikel über die deutsche Misplaced Pages um zu sehen die Unterschiede. Inzwischen habe ich eingeladen Ihre Kommentare. Grüße. --Rodhullandemu 22:43, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi! Der Artikel über Scientology hat kein Konzept und ist verwirrend. The english scientology article does not flow and is confusing. That's my point. Derflipper (talk) 22:47, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

OK, the article is meant meant to be a description, and there is a lot of material to be described. How to arrange all of that remains open to discussion. There are already several spin-off articles, and if you would like to suggest how topics can be further moved to such articles, please feel free to do so. Having said that, my experience is that major changes tend to attract unnecessary conflict; it's up to you to make suggestions. Grüße. --Rodhullandemu 22:56, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Just did that in the article discussion. Check it out. Derflipper (talk) 23:04, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Scientology arbitration

Per the request of arbitrator Roger Davies (talk), this notice is to inform you of the current arbitration case concerning Scientology, which can be viewed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Scientology. You are receiving this notification because you were one of the users listed in the new evidence presented by Cirt.

For Roger Davies and the Arbitration Committee
Daniel (talk) 08:27, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Schwarz-wald.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, File:Schwarz-wald.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 12:52, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Scientology arbitration

This is to notify you that you have been added as a involved party to the Scientology arbitration case; this is either because you have been mentioned in the /Evidence, the /Workshop or their talk pages, or because you are closely connected with it.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, KnightLago (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2009 (UTC)