Misplaced Pages

User talk:Optfx

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ZimZalaBim (talk | contribs) at 20:08, 6 April 2009 (→Criticism of Yahoo!: ani notice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:08, 6 April 2009 by ZimZalaBim (talk | contribs) (→Criticism of Yahoo!: ani notice)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

2

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Normal1.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Normal1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Normal1.jpg}

Thank you for uploading File:Normal1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Misplaced Pages:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:57, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Normal3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Normal3.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Misplaced Pages, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Criticism of Yahoo!

Only verifiable criticism, cited from reliable sources belongs in the article. Not original research rants by a disgruntled user. --ZimZalaBim 18:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Your edits at Criticism of Yahoo! & Yahoo! continue to be unsourced original research. To avoid edit warring, I've asked other administrator's to review them here. --ZimZalaBim 20:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)