This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Laveol (talk | contribs) at 07:30, 11 April 2009 (→Negush uprising: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 07:30, 11 April 2009 by Laveol (talk | contribs) (→Negush uprising: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)RfA...
...turns out to be short for "Request for Arrows". :) Thank you for your support and coming to my defense when I talked too much. :) This has been a hard but useful experience (useful experiences often are hard) and whether I ever accept a nomination again or not, I'm willing to address the cautions of the sincere Opposers and try to do better. Baseball Bugs 02:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
- And you'll get your cheese sandwich in my next e-mail. If I can figure out how to get it into that 3 1/2 inch slot in the PC. Baseball Bugs 02:54, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
Reverting my edit on Watchmen characters
I understand that it was redirected a long time ago. I did not see a discussion regarding the merge. I did however see the AfD which was in favor of keeping. Therefore I am reverting it. I understand your merge was bold however I disagree with it so I am asking that you discuss it before reverting my edit. I gave my reason for keeping the article on the talk page of Characters in Watchmen. Thanks :) Valoem 16:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Sorry I was a little hestiant in reverting Ozymandias as he was not as main a character as the others however he has established notability by being featured in the forbes fictional 15. Also I never saw any consensus for the merge I tried searching on the talk page and AfD. Valoem 16:51, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm a little confused I looked at the AfD and it looked like consensus was in favor of keeping those articles. Where was it discussed otherwise? It seems someone redirected and no one contested it (actually it looks like it was contested just not by established users). However, I am now contesting it, mainly because the characters are also featured in a film and a video game not just one comic book. I'm sure you would agree with me now right? :) Valoem 16:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Regarding your post on our edits on Ruby Gloom
How about I put the citation as "see Ruby Gloom skit titled 'Mr. Mummbles'. " Kagome 77 (talk) 11:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
I fixed it. The citation now says Ruby Gloom Skit: "The Mr. Mummbles How-to Show". This should work for that citation, since you should not link a youtube video to that, since the video may be taken down later on, due to copyright violations or other things. Kagome 77 (talk) 11:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Axmann8
Should be renamed "Puppetman" today. Baseball Bugs carrots 23:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah...
...Never say you don't learn stuff on Misplaced Pages! LessHeard vanU (talk) 02:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- If the Queen tells me too... We live for the nest, we die for the nest (we all believe in the Nest Life!) LessHeard vanU (talk) 02:41, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Curious
how did you do the upside-down text? .. a converter of some sort on the web? — Ched : Yes? : © 08:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
- That sounds interesting. Where are you seeing that? Baseball Bugs carrots 08:37, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Perhaps a temp semi-protect of Versus22's talk page?
Re your message: You must have been watching my screen. =) I just semi-protected his talk page for awhile. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:33, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- Re your message: Doesn't bother me any. =) They are still creating new accounts, so we shall see. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
Negush uprising
Please, do not revert back to the version. We've discussed it on the talkpage with two other editors and agreed the article was a hoax and an obvious POV fork of another article. It's up for deletion anyway or maybe for a redirect to the actual article. It was me that removed that info and justified my removal. It wasn't me reverting you later (I'm not the annon), but there is no grounds on which such an imaginative work of fiction should be an article on Misplaced Pages. Thanks for the understanding. --Laveol 07:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)