This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sennen goroshi (talk | contribs) at 00:28, 18 April 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:28, 18 April 2009 by Sennen goroshi (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) You have new messages (last change).
I do tend to delete messages when they are no longer relevant, so don't take offence if/when your message goes the way of the dodo
Re: Palin article..
In fact, I started by reverting you but I then searched for prior discussions about the subject and what I found seemed to back up your version. Since the matter is apparently not as trivial as I thought, I preferred letting the editors with more knowledge of the article deal with it and I undid my edit. Apologies for the confusion! (I still think having his name is not such a good idea, though) -- lucasbfr 15:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
- I am in two minds, on principal he was did nothing to deserve media attention he just happened to be the father of the daughter of someone famous - but if I am realistic his name was fully disclosed in the media and there is unlikely to be any harm done by having his name in the article - personal details are not required but revealing his name is not going to do him any harm. カンチョーSennen Goroshi ! (talk) 00:28, 18 April 2009 (UTC)