Misplaced Pages

:Requests for arbitration/Admin enforcement requested - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hersfold (talk | contribs) at 19:11, 23 April 2009 (→RFC HELP desperately neeed: wrong forum). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 19:11, 23 April 2009 by Hersfold (talk | contribs) (→RFC HELP desperately neeed: wrong forum)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Misplaced Pages Arbitration
Open proceedings
Active sanctions
Arbitration Committee
Audit
Track related changes
Shortcut
See also Misplaced Pages:Editing restrictions and Misplaced Pages:General sanctions.

This page lists requests by the Arbitration Committee that it feels need to be enforced by administrators. Administrators are not required to enforce these rulings but they are required not to stop those who do. Only Arbitration Committee members and clerks can add new items to this page. If a block is needed, then the administrator who conducts it should record it on the "log of blocks and bans" on the respective case page. Newer requests at top.

This page contains only active parts of a decision. For the full ruling, please see the respective decision page.

Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Ayn Rand

In the event that any user mentioned by name in this decision engages in further disruptive editing on Ayn Rand or any related article or page, the user may be banned from that page or from the entire topic of Ayn Rand for an appropriate length of time by any uninvolved administrator. Alternatively, the administrator may impose any other remedy reasonably tailored to the circumstances, such as a revert limitation. Similarly, an uninvolved administrator may impose a topic ban, revert limitation, or other appropriate sanction against any other editor who edits Ayn Rand or related articles or pages disruptively, provided that a warning has first been given with a link to this decision. As to any user named in this decision, the first sentence of this remedy shall be in effect for one year from the date of this decision or one year from the expiration of any topic ban applied to the user in this decision, whichever is later.

Editors not specifically named or sanctioned in this case are not excused or exonerated for any inappropriate conduct. Administrators and the community may choose to enact additional topic bans, blocks, site bans, or other sanctions, as necessary to prevent disruption and ensure a productive editing environment.

Mailer Diablo 03:50, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

G.-M. Cupertino

G.-M. Cupertino is banned from Misplaced Pages for a period of one year, and restricted to one account should he return after his ban.

Mailer Diablo 23:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Abtract and Collectonian

Abtract (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) shall not interact with, or comment in any way (directly or indirectly) about, Collectonian, on any page in Misplaced Pages; harass or wikistalk Collectonian such as by editing pages that Collectonian has recently edited; or make uncivil comments about or personal attacks upon any user.

These restrictions imposed upon Abtract shall be interpreted in a reasonable fashion so as to allow Abtract to continue with appropriate editing while preventing any further harassment of Collectonian. Any attempts to "game the system" or "wikilawyer" the details of the restrictions are unwelcome. Should Abtract violate the restrictions imposed upon him, he may be blocked for an appropriate period of time by any uninvolved administrator, with any blocks to be logged here. Collectonian is urged to continue to avoid any unnecessary interaction with Abtract.

Daniel (talk) 13:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Arbitration Committee motions for discretionary sanctions

The Arbitration Committee has rendered decisions passing two motions to apply discretionary sanctions remedies to three prior cases. Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the areas of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.

The areas of conflicts have been defined as "articles which relate to pseudoscience, broadly interpreted" for the Martinphi-ScienceApologist and Pseudoscience cases, and as "articles which relate to Eastern Europe, broadly interpreted" for the Digwuren case.

The final text of the motions can be found at the case pages linked above.

— Coren  for the Arbitration Committee, 14:18, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Homeopathy

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available here. In short, the remedy passed that requires admin enforcement is:

  • Discretionary sanctions: Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict (defined as articles which relate to homeopathy, broadly interpreted) if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project. Nishkid64 (Make articles, not wikidrama) 00:07, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Footnoted quotes

This arbitration case has been closed and the full final decision is available here. In short, the remedies passed were:

  • Special enforcement on biographies of living persons: a special enforcement on biography of living persons (BLP) articles is authorised, whereby administrators uninvolved with an article may, for that BLP, "use any and all means at their disposal to ensure that every Misplaced Pages article is in full compliance with the letter and spirit of the biographies of living persons policy". Administrators are authorised to utilise their protection and blocking tools as necessary to ensure that the article complies with Misplaced Pages's BLP policy, and are also directed to actively counsel any editors whos actions fail to comply with the BLP policy. Administrators are cautioned not to reverse or modify such actions without clear community consensus to do so; appeals against restrictions put in place may be made to either: the relevant administrators' noticeboard; or, the arbitration committee directly. Before any article-based restrictions are extended to an individual editor, this counselling must take place: restrictions put in place should be logged at Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons/Special enforcement log, with relevant links to attempts to counsel the editor. The full text of this special enforcement is available here.
  • Alansohn restricted: Alansohn (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is subject to an editing restriction for one year, whereby he may be blocked for making any edits judged by an administrator to be be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, for "up to a week in the event of repeated violations". The full text is available here. Ryan Postlethwaite 23:10, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Prem Rawat

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Evidence presented did not disclose a history of problematic editing, in terms of basic content policy, by Jossi, and the Committee commended Jossi's self-imposed restriction to edit only talk pages for Prem Rawat related articles. Due to a history of incivility and personal attacks surrounding articles related to the Prem Rawat movement, the preexisting community enforced one-revert rule on Prem Rawat and related articles that commenced March 4, 2008, has been superceeded by Arbitration Committee enforced article probation. John Vandenberg 00:13, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

September 11 conspiracy theories

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Further to this, any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, "impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict (defined as articles which relate to the events of September 11, broadly interpreted) if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process." The full remedy is located here.

For the Arbitration Committee, Anthøny 15:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Strider12

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Strider12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from Misplaced Pages for a period of one year. Should Strider12 resume editing Misplaced Pages, she shall be assigned a volunteer mentor, who will be asked to assist her in understanding and following policy and community practice to a sufficient level that continued sanctions will not be necessary. Daniel (talk) 12:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)


Franco-Mongol alliance

This Arbitration case is closed and the final decision has been published at the link above. PHG (talk · contribs) is prohibited from editing articles relating to medieval or ancient history for a period of one year. He is permitted to make suggestions on talk pages, provided that he interacts with other editors in a civil fashion. Thatcher 01:15, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Mantanmoreland

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Misplaced Pages's role with respect to serious off-wiki or "real world" controversies and disputes is to provide encyclopedic coverage of such matters from a neutral point of view where they are notable and sufficiently documented in reliable sources. Neither Misplaced Pages's mainspace article content, nor its administrative and dispute-resolution procedures culminating in Arbitration, are intended or may be used as a vehicle for off-wiki disputes such as those involving the financial markets or legal or regulatory issues. Actions related to the articles involved, including naked short selling, overstock.com, Patrick M. Byrne, the (now-redirected article) Judd Bagley, and Gary Weiss, have been repeatedly disruptive and have had serious implications both on and off wiki. Any current of future editor making substantial edits to these articles is direct ed:

(A) To edit on these from only a single user account, which shall be the user's sole or main account;
(B) To edit only through a conventional ISP and not through any form of proxy configuration;
(C) To edit in accordance with all Misplaced Pages policies and to refrain from any form of advocacy concerning any external controversy, dispute, allegation, or proceeding; and
(D) To disclose on the relevant talk pages any circumstances (but not including personal identifying information) that constitute or may reasonably be perceived as constituting a conflict of interest with respect to that page.

Any uninvolved admin may impose reasonable restrictions, after warning, upon involved articles or editors. Knowledgeable and uninvolved editors are urged to review these articles to ensure accuracy, fairness, and adherence to wiki policies. User:Mantanmoreland, under any current or future account, is banned from editing articles related to Gary Weiss, Patrick Byrne, Overstock.com, Naked Short Selling, and other mainspace articles in the area of dispute, broadly construed. He may make suggestions on talk pages, subject to the requirements of remedy 1. User:Mantanmoreland is directed to edit Misplaced Pages from only a single user account and to advise the Arbitration Committee of any change of username, and to edit only through a conventional ISP and not through any form of proxy configuration.

For the committee, — Rlevse • Talk • 21:47, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


Waterboarding

This Arbitration case has closed, and the final decision may be reviewed through the above link. Further to the relevant findings of fact, Waterboarding and all closely-related pages are subject to article probation (full remedy); editors working on Waterboarding, or closely related pages, may be subject to an editing restriction at the discretion of any uninvolved administrator, whereby any edits by that editor which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, may result in a block. (full remedy).

Should any user subject to an editing restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After 5 blocks, the maximum block length shall increase to one year (full enforcement). Before such restrictions are enacted on an editor, he or she must be issued with a warning containing a link to the decision.

For the Arbitration Committee,
AGK (talk) 14:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

IRC

This arbitration case has closed and the final decision may be found at the link above. Giano is placed on civility restriction for one year. Should Giano make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, Giano may be blocked for the duration specified in the enforcement ruling. For the Arbitration committee, Thatcher 04:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Dbachmann

This arbitration case has now closed and the decision may be found at the link above. Dbachmann is reminded to avoid using his administrative tools in editorial disputes in which he is personally involved, and to avoid misusing the administrative rollback tool for content reversions. Afrocentrism and Race of ancient Egyptians are placed on article probation. For the arbitration committee, David Mestel 20:13, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Zeraeph

This arbitration has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The case was renamed upon closing from "Zeraeph-SandyGeorgia" to "Zeraeph". User:Zeraeph, including and socks and future accounts, is banned from Misplaced Pages for one year. — Rlevse • Talk • 14:26, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Macedonia

The above arbitration case has closed, and the final decision may be found here. Any uninvolved administrator may, on their own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working on Balkans-related articles if that editor fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, the expected standards of behavior, or the normal editorial process. Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the administrators' noticeboard, or the Committee. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 02:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Asgardian-Tenebrae

This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Asgardian is subject to an editing restriction for one year. He is limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Should Asgardian violate this restriction, he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After 5 blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one month.

Eyrian

This Arbitration case has now closed, and the final decision is available at the above link. Whereas Eyrian has engaged in abusive sock puppetry in an apparent attempt to game the system, and failed to offer any reasonable explanation for his actions, his Administrator privileges are revoked (and may only be restored through appeal to the Arbitration Committee), and is banned from Misplaced Pages until he provides satisfactory explanation regarding this matter.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Anthøny 17:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Martinphi-ScienceApologist

This arbitration case has now closed, and the decision may be found at the link above. Martinphi and ScienceApologist are subect to an editing restriction for one year, and should they make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be disruptive, they may be banned from any affected page or set of pages. ScienceApologist is limited to one account. For the arbitration committee, David Mestel 18:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Sadi Carnot

This arbitration case has now closed and the decision may be found at the link above. Sadi Carnot is banned for one year, and the remaining parties are encouraged to "move forward from this unfortunate incident with a spirit of mutual understanding and forgiveness". For the arbitration committee, David Mestel 12:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Ebionites

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The Arbitration Committee found that MichaelCPrice (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has engaged in sustained edit-warring and is subject to an editing restriction for one year, he is limited to one revert per page per week and must discuss any content changes on the article's talk page. Should any user subject to an editing restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeated violations. After 5 blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one month. For the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 04:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Bharatveer

This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Bharatveer is subject to a comprehensive editing restriction for one year. He is limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. If he exceeds this limit, fails to discuss a content reversion, or makes any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked as set forth in the decision's enforcement provision.

Digwuren

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Among the principles passed was At wit's end which states that necessary measures must be adopted by the Arbitration Committee in cases where repeated attempts to stop disruptive disputes have failed. As a result of the case, both Digwuren and Petri Krohn are banned for one year. There has also been a general restriction to all editors working on topis related to Eastern Europe and a warning to all those who may, in the future, attempt to use Misplaced Pages as a battleground that they may be banned when the matter is reported to the Committee. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 18:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Giovanni33-John Smith's

This arbitration case has closed. Giovanni33 and John Smith's are subject to identical editing restrictions for one year. They are limited to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Should they exceed this limit or fail to discuss a content reversion, they may be blocked. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 20:11, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


DreamGuy 2

This arbitration case has now closed and the decision may be found at the link above. DreamGuy is subject to a behavioural editing restriction. For the arbitration committee, David Mestel 17:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Jmfangio-Chrisjnelson

Chrisjnelson is restricted to one revert per page per week (excepting obvious vandalism), and is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page for a duration of six months. If he exceeds this limit, fails to discuss a content reversion, or makes any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, he may be blocked. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 15:20, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

COFS

The above arbitration case has recently concluded. COFS (now Shutterbug) is asked to refrain from recruiting editors whose editing interests are limited to Scientology-related topics. Anynobody is prohibited from harassing Justanother, and Justanother is urged to avoid interesting himself in Anynobody's actions. "Should Anynobody violate the prohibition on harassment, they may be briefly blocked, for up to a month in the event of repeat offenses. After five blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one year. All bans are to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/COFS#Log of blocks and bans." All Scientology-related articles are placed on article probation. For the Arbitration Committee, Cbrown1023 talk 03:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Great Irish Famine

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The article Great Irish Famine is placed under the mentorship of three to five administrators to be named later. All content reversions on this page must be discussed on the article talk page. Further terms of the mentorship are contained in the decision and will be amplified on the article talkpage. Sarah777 may be banned from editing any page which she disrupts by engaging in aggressive biased editing or by making anti-British remarks. MarkThomas is placed on standard civility supervision for one year. This notice is given by a clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 22:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Zacheus-jkb

This arbitration case has now closed and the decision may be found at the link above. -jkb- and Zacheus are admonished for their behaviour, and directed to refrain from importing outside disputes into the English Misplaced Pages, disclosing real names or other identifying personal information on-wiki, and from making personal attacks and uncivil remarks. For the arbitration committee, David Mestel 21:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Transnistria

This arbitration case has now closed and the decision may be found at the link above. Markstreet and sockpuppets, as well as William Mauco and EvilAlex are indefinitely banned from making any contributions related to Transnistria. This applies to all namespaces, including talk and user talk pages. For the arbitration committee, David Mestel 17:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

TingMing

The above named arbitration case has closed. TingMing (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from wikipedia for 1 year. Please be advised that TingMing is currently indefinitely banned and the 1 year duration will start should it be lifted.

For the Arbitration Committee,
- Penwhale | 19:34, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Falun Gong

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 06:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


Freedom skies

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

  • Freedom skies is placed on standard revert parole for one year. He is limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism. Further, he is required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page.
  • Freedom skies shall select one account and use only that account. Any other account used may be indefinitely banned. Pending selection of an account Freedom skies may not edit Misplaced Pages.
  • Violations of paroles and probations imposed on parties of this case shall be enforced by blocks for an appropriate period of time. Blocks and bans are to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Freedom skies#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 18:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Mudaliar-Venki123

This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Mudaliar and User:Venki123 are each banned from editing Misplaced Pages for a period of one year. Newyorkbrad 15:24, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Billy Ego-Sandstein

The above named arbitration case has closed. Billy Ego is banned for one year as the result of this case.

The full decision can be view at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Billy Ego-Sandstein.

For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | 21:21, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Armenia-Azerbaijan

AdilBaguirov, Artaxiad (formerly User:Nareklm), and Fadix are each banned from editing Misplaced Pages for a period of one year. Aivazovsky, Atabek, Azerbaijani, Dacy69, Elsanaturk, Eupator, Fedayee, Grandmaster, ROOB323 and TigranTheGreat are each placed on standard revert parole; each is limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism, and required to discuss any content reversions on the article talkpage. ROOB323 is also placed on civility parole for 1 year. If any editor violates the parole, he may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for each offenses. After 5 such blocks, the maximum block time is increased to a year. - Penwhale | 01:01, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


Lukas19-LSLM

The above entitled arbitration case has now closed and the decision may be found at the link above. LSLM (talk · contribs) and Lukas19 (talk · contribs) are each banned from Misplaced Pages for one year. For the arbitration committee, David Mestel 13:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Free Republic

The indefinite community ban of User:BryanFromPalatine is endorsed. The ban also applies to User:DeanHinnen and all other proxies or sockpuppets of BryanFromPalatine. User:Fairness And Accuracy For All is banned from Misplaced Pages for one year. The articles Free Republic and Democratic Underground are placed on article probation. It is expected that these articles will be improved to conform with Misplaced Pages:Neutral point of view, and that information contained in them will be supported by verifiable information from reliable sources. Either article may be reviewed on the motion of any arbitrator, or upon acceptance by the Arbitration Committee of a motion made by any user, and users whose editing is disruptive may be banned or their editing restricted as the result of a review. Newyorkbrad 00:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Amended

In light of continued disputes, remedy 4 adopted in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic is amended by adding:

"Additionally, any uninvolved administrator may impose a reasonable editing restriction (for example, 1RR) or page ban upon any editor who repeatedly engages in disruptive or uncivil editing of Free Republic or any closely related page. Prior to imposing such a ban or restriction, a warning should be given on the affected user's talkpage. All bans and restrictions shall be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic#Log of blocks and bans."
All editors, particularly including single purpose accounts and editors who have or may reasonably be perceived as having a conflict of interest, are strongly urged to edit Free Republic and related articles only in conformity with all Misplaced Pages policies and with this committee's prior decision. If the enhanced administrator authority provided in this ruling does not improve the situation on this article after 30 days, a request for a more formal Arbitration Committee review may be submitted.

Barrett v. Rosenthal

The above-entitled arbitration case has been closed and the final decision published at the above link. Ilena (talk · contribs) is banned from editing Misplaced Pages for one year and is banned from editing articles and talk pages related to alternative medicine, except talk pages related to breat implants. Fyslee (talk · contribs) is cautioned to use reliable sources and to edit from a neutral point of view. He is reminded that editors with a known partisan point of view should be careful to seek consensus on the talk page of articles to avoid the appearance of a COI if other editors question their edits. For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 12:42, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Waldorf education/Review

The reviewing of the RfAr for Waldorf education has concluded. The Arbitration Committee has banned User:Pete K from editing Waldorf education, PLANS, Rudolf Steiner, Anthroposophy, and related pages or their talk pages. Enforcement help is needed. Penwhale | 18:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Robert Prechter

This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Smallbones is banned indefinitely from editing articles that relate to Robert Prechter, including talk pages. If Smallbones violates this ban he may be briefly blocked. Newyorkbrad 01:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Occupation of Latvia

This arbitration case has closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The parties identified in the decision as having acted poorly in the dispute regarding Occupation of Latvia 1940-1945 are admonished to avoid such behavior in the future. That article is placed on probation, and any editor may be banned from it, or from other reasonably related pages, by an uninvolved administrator for disruptive edits, including, but not limited to, edit warring, inciviilty, and original research. The Arbitration Committee reserves the right to appoint one or more mentors at any time, and the right to review the situation in one year, if appropriate. The parties are strongly encouraged to enter into a mediation arrangement regarding any article-content issues that may still be outstanding. If the article is not substantially improved by continued editing, the Arbitration Committee may impose editing restrictions on users whose editing is counterproductive or disruptive. Newyorkbrad 23:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


Sathya Sai Baba 2

The above-named arbitration case has closed and the complete decision can be found at the link above. Andries, Wikisunn, SSS108, and Freelanceresearch are banned indefinitely from editing Sathya Sai Baba and related articles or their talk pages. Ekantik is instructed to make all future Misplaced Pages contributions related in any way to Sathya Sai Baba under a single username. Kkrystian is reminded that all edits must be supported by reliable sources. Editors involved at Sathya Sai Baba are encouraged to use better sources and improved citation style. The remedies in the prior decision Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba regarding poorly sourced information remain in force and apply to all editors working on Sathya Sai Baba and related articles. The Arbitration Committee reserves the right to amend these remedies as required and to issue additional remedies as necessary to provide a positive environment for collaboration on the Sathya Sai Baba article, even if no additional case is brought forward. Newyorkbrad 00:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Remedy 1.1 in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Sathya Sai Baba 2, which provides that "Andries is banned indefinitely from editing Sathya Sai Baba and related articles or their talk pages," has been amended (as a result of a successful motion) by striking out the words "or their talk pages." Thus, Andries is now permitted to edit the talkpages of these articles, but not the articles themselves. In doing so, he is cautioned to be mindful of all applicable Misplaced Pages policies including those concerning conflicts of interest and biographies of living persons. Daniel (talk) 02:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

India-Pakistan

The above entitled arbitration case is now closed and the decision may be found at the link above. Szhaider, Unre4L, Siddiqui and Nadirali are each banned from editing Misplaced Pages for one year. For the arbitration committee, David Mestel 21:57, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Derek Smart

This arbitration case has closed and the decision is available at the link above. For a period of six months, no single-purpose account may revert any edit made to the Derek Smart article. This article is referred to the Misplaced Pages editing community for clean-up, evaluation of sources, and adherence to NPOV. Any user may fully apply the principles of Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons to this article. Supreme Cmdr is banned from Misplaced Pages for one year. Supreme Cmdr and other surrogates of Derek Smart are also banned from editing Derek Smart, but may edit the talkpage. This is a summary of the remedy provisions of the decision. Administrators and and editors should review the complete text of the decision before taking any action. Newyorkbrad 00:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

WLU-Mystar

This arbitration case has closed and the decision is available at the link above. WLU (talk · contribs) and Mystar (talk · contribs) are prohibited from interacting with each other or commenting on each other, directly or indirectly, on any Misplaced Pages page, and may be blocked for up to one week for each violation. For the purpose of this remedy, any edit by either WLU or Mystar to one of the articles over which they had previously been in conflict (including, but not limited to, Terry Goodkind and Lupus Erythematosus) shall be considered an interaction with the other party. For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 12:33, 23 February 2007 (UTC)

Yoshiaki Omura

This arbitration case has closed and the decision is available at the link above. Richardmalter and all other accounts and anonymous IPs with the same disruptive editing pattern are indefinitely banned from editing Yoshiaki Omura or its talk page. They may be blocked for up to one year if they do so. Blocks, and any alternative accounts or IPs used, should be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Yoshiaki Omura#Log of blocks and bans. Care should be taken with anonymous IPs to avoid blocking addresses used by other users. The remedies in this matter apply to any article concerning the Bi-Digital O-Ring Test (BDORT or PMRT) under any title. For the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 23:37, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Midnight Syndicate

This arbitration case has been closed. GuardianZ and Skinny McGee are banned indefinitely from the article Midnight Syndicate. Dionyseus is banned for three months from Midnight Syndicate. No present or past employee or associate of the band Midnight Syndicate, Nox Arcana, or Monolith Graphics, under any username or anonymous IP, may edit Midnight Syndicate or associated articles (it is acceptable for such persons to make suggestions on the talk page; it is especially helpful if they identify themselves and the roles they play or played in the group). The complete text of the decision can be found at the link above. For the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad, 00:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Naming Conventions

The case is now closed and the results have been posted at the link above.

  • It is the responsibility of the administrators and other responsible parties to close extended policy discussions they are involved in, such as this dispute. Closing consists of announcing the decision at the locations of the discussion and briefly explaining the basis for closing it in the way it is being closed; further, to change any policy pages, guidelines or naming conventions to conform with the decision; and finally, to enforce the decision with respect to recalcitrant users who violate the decision, after reminding them and warning them.
  • Given the existence of some uncertainty regarding how to determine if there is consensus in a particular case, no remedy is proposed concerning those who violated the consensus in this matter for past violations of policy.
  • Izzy Dot's editing privileges are suspended for a period of 14 days.

For the Arbitration Committee, Cowman109 04:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Brahma Kumaris

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

195.82.106.244 is banned for one year for a personal attack which contained a threat against another user . 195.82.106.244 is placed on Probation. He may be banned from editing any article which he disrupts by engaging in aggressive biased editing, especially that relying on inadequately sourced original research. Brahma Kumaris World Spiritual University is placed on article probation. The principals in this matter are expected to convert the article from its present state based on original research and BK publications to an article containing verifiable information based on reliable third party sources. After a suitable grace period, the state of the article may be evaluated on the motion of any member of the Arbitration Committee and further remedies applied to those editors who continue to edit in an inappropriate manner. Any user may request review by members of the Arbitration Committee. Should any user violate a ban imposed under the terms of this decision, they may be blocked for an appropriate period of time. All blocks to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Brahma Kumaris#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 17:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Sex tourism

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

  • KyndFellow is indefinitely banned from editing sex tourism and related articles as well as their talk pages. It is presumed that articles regarding any person, business or service or any accommodation or sex tourism destination mentioned on his websites are related articles, but the ban extends to all articles which relate to sexual services or sex tourism destinations.
  • KyndFellow, editing under any username or anonymous ip, is indefinitely placed on Probation. He may be banned from any article or talk page which he disrupts by aggressive biased editing.
  • Content questions regarding the appropriateness of mention or links to the sites promoted by KyndFellow are not addressed; those questions being left to editorial discretion exercised in the normal course of editing.
  • KyndFellow, should he violate any ban imposed under the terms of this decision, may be blocked for an appropriate period of time.
  • Sock or meatpuppets which edit in the same manner and with the same themes as KyndFellow are subject to the remedies imposed on KyndFellow. Indefinite blocks may be imposed on aggressive socks. All blocks and bans to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Sex tourism#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 06:01, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Waldorf education

The above entitled arbitration case has closed, and the final decision has been issued at the above link. Waldorf education, Rudolf Steiner, Anthroposophy and the extended family of related articles such as Social Threefolding are placed on article probation. Editors of these articles are expected to remove all original research and other unverifiable information, including all controversial information sourced in Anthroposophy related publications. It is anticipated that this process may result in deletion or merger of some articles due to failure of verification by third party peer reviewed sources. If it is found, upon review by the Arbitration Committee, that any of the principals in this arbitration continue to edit in an inappropriate and disruptive way editing restrictions may be imposed. Review may be at the initiative of any member of the Arbitration Committee on their own motion or upon petition by any user to them.

For the arbitration committee, Thatcher131 23:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

RPJ

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

  • RPJ is banned from Misplaced Pages for one year.
  • RPJ is placed on indefinite probation. He may be banned from the site for an appropriate period by any administrator if he edits in a disruptive manner.
  • Edits by anonymous ips or alternative accounts which mirror RPJ's editing behavior are subject to the remedies applied to RPJ. Blocks and bans to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/RPJ#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 05:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC)


Hkelkar

This case is now closed and the results have been posted above.

For the Arbitration committee, Cowman109 06:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)


ScienceApologist

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 17:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Elvis

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

For the Arbitration committee. Cowman109 20:41, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Pseudoscience

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Non-Notability

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Fresheneesz may be placed on probation if he continues to disrupt policy pages. Such action shall be by a successful motion at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration#Motions_in_prior_cases by any member of the Arbitration Committee after complaints received from one or more users.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 03:52, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Rachel Marsden

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Per Misplaced Pages:External links#Links normally to be avoided, articles should not link to copies of press reports archived on any site in violation of copyright. Per Misplaced Pages:Citing sources#Intermediate sources: State where you got it, citations should state the original source (i.e. the LA Times) and the intermediate source (i.e. "as retrieved from LexisNexis on October 16, 2006"). Articles which relate to Rachel Marsden, may, when they violate Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons, be reduced to a stub by any user or deleted, together with their talk pages, by any administrator. Bearcat and Bucketsofg are expected to conform to Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons rather than the liberal interpretation they have applied. For violation of his previously imposed article ban, as well as edit warring, block evasion, and sockpuppety, Arthur Ellis is banned from editing Misplaced Pages for one month.

For the Arbitration Committee, Arbitration Committee Clerk, FloNight 16:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


Jean-Thierry Boisseau

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Jean-Thierry Boisseau and other users affiliated with Musik Fabrik are banned from editing any article dealing with artists or projects listed in their sales catalog. Further, they may not add any such artist or project to any article. There is no restriction on making suggestions or participating in discussions on talk pages. Jean-Thierry Boisseau is placed on probation. He may be banned from any article or talk page which he disrupts. Any bans imposed under this decision may be enforced by blocking the offender for a period of up to a week. All blocks to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Jean-Thierry_Boisseau#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 06:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Ulritz

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Ulritz and Rex Germanus are placed on revert parole. They are limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism. Further, they are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page. Ulritz and Rex Germanus are placed on probation for one year. They may be banned from any page or set of pages for disruptive edits, such as edit warring or incivility. All blocks and bans and are to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Ulritz#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 06:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Subsequent motion passed: The anonymous editor who edits from the 194.9.5.0/24 range and was also a part to Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Ulritz shall be subject to the same restrictions as Ulritz and Rex Germanus for edit warring at involved articles. See #Ulritz_placed_on_Probation and #Ulritz_placed_on_revert parole for the applicable restrictions. For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 21:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Vivaldi

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Preying from the Pulpit, First Baptist Church of Hammond, Jack Hyles, Hyles-Anderson College, and any related article which contains poorly sourced controversial material are placed on article probation. The material in dispute between Vivaldi and Arbustoo has been determined to be controversial material which does not have an adequate source. They are warned to avoid edit warring and encouraged to edit the articles in dispute appropriately.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 18:49, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


Kven

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Kven-user limited to one account and is placed on probation. He may be banned from any article or set of articles which he disrupts by aggressive biased editing. The Kven-user is banned from editing articles related to Kven or making any edits regarding the topic. Should Kven-user edit under any username or IP prior to selecting a username any edit made may be removed on sight and the account indefinitely blocked. Should Kven-user violate any ban, he may be briefly blocked, up to a month in the event of repeat offenses. All blocks to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Kven#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

For the Arbitration Committee --Srikeit 00:19, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


Honda S2000

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

SpinyNorman is required to edit using only one account. SpinyNorman may be banned from any article he disrupts. SpinyNorman is placed on personal attack parole. He may be banned for an appropriate period of time if he makes personal attacks. SpinyNorman is placed on revert parole. He is limited to 1 revert per week on any article, excluding obvious vandalism. Should SpinyNorman continue to disrupt Misplaced Pages he may be banned for an appropriate period, up to a year. All bans to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Honda_S2000#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

For the Arbitration Committee. Arbitration Committee Clerk, FloNight 14:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Kosovo

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

For edit warring, personal attacks, and other disruption, PerfectStorm/C-c-c-c is banned from editing Misplaced Pages for one year. For edit warring and incivility, Bormalagurski is banned from editing Misplaced Pages from one year. For edit warring and disruptive use of sockpuppets, Dardanv under any username or IP, is banned from editing Misplaced Pages for one month.

Hipi Zhdripi is limited to his one named account, Hipi Zhdripi. All edits by Hipi Zhdripi under another account or an IP address shall be treated as edits by a banned user.

Ilir pz, Hipi Zhdripi, Vezaso are banned for one year from editing articles related to Kosovo. Relation to Kosovo is to be interpreted broadly so as to prevent gaming. Either may be banned from any related non-article page for disruptive editing. All articles related to Kosovo are put on Article probation to allow more swift dealing with disruption. Editors of Kosovo and related articles who engage in edit warring, incivility, original research, or other disruptive editing, may be banned for an appropriate period of time, in extreme cases indefinitely.

ChrisO is warned not to engage in edit warring, and to engage in only calm discussion and dispute resolution when in conflict. He is instructed not to use the administrative rollback tool in content disputes and encouraged to develop the ability and practice of assisting users who are having trouble understanding and applying Misplaced Pages policies in doing so. .

Dardanv, Ferick, Laughing Man, Osli73, and Tonycdp are placed on Probation for one year. Each may be banned from any page or set of pages for disruptive edits, such as edit warring or incivility.

Ilir pz, Hipi Zhdripi, Vezaso, Dardanv, Ferick, Laughing Man, Osli73, and Tonycdp are placed on standard revert parole for one year. Each is limited to one revert per article per week, excepting obvious vandalism. Further, each is required to discuss any content reversions on the article's talk page.

For the Arbitration Committee. Arbitration Committee Clerk, 04:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

MONGO

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

PrivateEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Rootology (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are banned indefinitely from Misplaced Pages. No action is taken against MONGO for any excessive zeal he has displayed. Links to Encyclopædia Dramatica may be removed wherever found on Misplaced Pages as may material imported from it. Users who insert links to Encyclopædia Dramatica or who copy material from it here may be blocked for an appropriate period of time. Care should be taken to warn naive users before blocking. Strong penalties may be applied to those linking to or importing material which harasses other users.

For the Arbitration Committee. Arbitration Committee Clerk, FloNight 02:52, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Israel-Lebanon

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above.

Editors are cautioned that there may be exceptions to Misplaced Pages Guidelines and Style Guides due to unusual circumstances such as an important current event. Decisions need to be based on utility of the article to readers, not to literal compliance with Misplaced Pages rules. A diverse mix of blogs is recommended, but the extent and selection of specific blogs is a matter of content to be determined by the editors of the article. Any user, particularly Tasc, who engages in edit warring with respect to 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict may be banned from the article for an appropriate period. All bans are to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Israel-Lebanon#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee. FloNight 03:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


Kosovo

For the duration of this case, any of the named parties may be banned by an uninvolved administrator from Kosovo or related pages for disruptive edits.

Affected users are listed in the case, and have all been notified. The affected articles (and two templates) have all been labelled with appropriate notices.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 18:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Intangible

This case is now closed and the results have been published at the link above. Intangible and AaronS are placed on probation and may be banned for appropriate periods from any article or set of articles which he disrupts by tendentious editing. Should any user placed on Probation under this ruling violate any ban imposed under this decision, they may be blocked for an appropriate period of time. Blocks are to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Intangible#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee. - Mgm| 08:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


CoolKatt number 99999

This case is now closed and the result has been published at the link above.

For the Arbitration Committee. FloNight 21:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Heqong

This case is now closed and the result has been published at the link above.

  • Heqong is placed on Probation. He may be banned for a reasonable period of time by any administrator from an article or set of articles which he disrupts by tendentious editing. Should Heqong violate a ban he may be blocked for a reasonable period of time. All blocks to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Heqong#Log of blocks and bans.
  • Heqong is banned for one month for personal attacks.
  • Heqong is placed on personal attack parole.

For the Arbitration Committee. --FloNight 14:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Ericsaindon2

This case is now closed and the result has been published at the link above.

  • Ericsaindon2 is required to choose one username and edit only with that name.
  • Ericsaindon2 is banned from Misplaced Pages for one year due to a variety of disruptive activities.
  • Ericsaindon2 is placed on Probation. He may be banned for an appropriate time from any article or set of articles which he disrupts.

For the Arbitration Committee. --FloNight 06:12, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Eternal Equinox

This case is now closed and the result has been published at the link above.

Eternal Equinox (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is placed on Probation and personal attack parole for one year.

Jim62sch (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) is cautioned to avoid teasing or taunting sensitive users.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 13:39, 30 August 2006 (UTC)




Moby Dick

Case just closed. User:Moby Dick is:

  • Banned from Turkey and Kurdish related articles, blockable up to a week. After 5 blocks, range can increase to a year.
  • Cannot harass Megaman Zero, Cool Cat (or any other user which at least 3 admins deem it necessary), blockable up t oa month. After 5 blocks, range increases to a year.

More details at the usual place. -- Drini 22:13, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


Saladin1970

This case has been closed and the final decision is published at the link above.

  • Based on his personal attacks on a administrator, Saladin1970 is banned from Misplaced Pages for one year.
  • Saladin1970 is placed indefinitely on personal attack parole. If he engages in personal attacks he may be banned by any administrator for a period consistent with the nature of the personal attacks. Links to an external site devoted to personal attacks on Misplaced Pages editors may result in a ban of a year or more.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 06:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)



Election

This case has closed.

  • Article probation: The articles which are the locus of dispute, Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Election/Proposed decision#Locus of dispute, are placed on probation. Any editor may be banned from any or all of the articles, or other reasonably related pages, by an administrator for disruptive edits, including, but not limited to, edit warring, incivilty, and original research. The Arbitration Committee reserves the right to appoint one or more mentors at any time, and will review the situation in one year.
  • The editors involved in this Arbitration proceeding may continue to edit the articles using the wiki process.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 13:08, 1 July 2006 (UTC)


Locke Cole

This arbitration case is closed. For full details see the link above.

  • For persistent edit warring, Netoholic (talk · contribs) is banned from editing in the template namespace for one year from the end of this case, and is restricted to one revert per page per day.

Delivered for the Arbitration Committee in my capacity as clerk. I take no part in making these decisions. --Tony Sidaway 10:44, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


Messhermit

This arbitration case is closed.

Messhermit is banned for one year from editing articles which relate to the conflict between Peru and Ecuador. Messhermit and Andres C. are placed on Misplaced Pages:Probation.

Full details of the final decision are at the case page at the above link.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 02:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Terryeo

This case is closed.

Terryeo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from articles related to Scientology and Dianetics, placed indefinitely on Misplaced Pages:Probation and Personal Attack Parole. The usual enforcement provisions apply. See the link above for details.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 17:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Aucaman

This arbitration case is now closed.

Further details are given in the decision at the link above.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 15:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Depleted uranium

This arbitration case has closed. James S. is banned from depleted uranium, placed on probation, and placed on general probation. Those opposing editors who have made personal attacks on James S. are reminded of the policies regarding courtesy and personal attacks. TDC is placed on revert parole. For further details, please see the arbitration case. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 17:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Lou franklin]

This arbitration case has closed. Lou franklin is indefinitely banned from editing Societal attitudes towards homosexuality and related articles and discussion pages. He is also placed on personal attack and revert parole. These remedies will be enforced by block. For further details, please see the arbitration case page. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 18:06, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

FourthAve

This arbitration case has closed. FourthAve is banned from Misplaced Pages for a year, and is placed on personal attack parole, probation, and general probation. This will be enforced by block. I have carried out the one-year-ban in my capacity as an administrator. For further details, please see the arbitration case. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 15:48, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Agapetos angel

Agapetos angel et al. are banned from editing Jonathan Sarfati and associated articles. Any user banned by this decision who violates the ban may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeat offenses. After 5 blocks the maximum ban shall increase to one year. For further information, please see the arbitration case. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 18:19, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

DPSingh banned

For continued violation of his article ban for edit warring and incivility using sockpuppets, DPSingh (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned from editing Misplaced Pages for one year.

In Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_CheckUser#Rajput_case there is an account by David_Gerard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) of the most recent sockery as follows:

  • Dmcdevit asked me to look into a pile of suspected sockpuppets related to the Rajput dispute, specifically Comte De Boigne, Saubhag Singh, Hukum singh, Dhruv Singh, Dhruv singh, Raj tilak, Banke.
    DPSingh socks: Shomu, Hukum singh, Addul, Jamwal, Kalhana, Inayat Bhati, Jmawal, Inder Singh, Anveshan, IP 202.138.112.252. All blocked.
    Dhruv Singh, Dhruv singh, Raj tilak and Banke appear to be single-purpose accounts created for this dispute. All blocked.
    Saubhag Singh: apparent role account, created only for this style of edit. Could be a cohort or using a compromised machine.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 23:31, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

ZAROVE

The Arbitration Committee has reached a final decision in the Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/ZAROVE case. ZAROVE is prohibited from editing Acharya S or any related pages, and from making any comment on any page about her or her son. If ZAROVE violates either of the remedies in this decision, he may be briefly banned for up to two weeks for repeat offenses. After 5 such blocks the maximum block length shall be extended to one year. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:13, 14 April 2006 (UTC)


Lapsed Pacifist

A final decision has been reached in the above arbitration case, and the case has been closed.

Lapsed_Pacifist (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned indefinitely from articles which relate to the conflict in Northern Ireland. The ban is intended to include any page in Misplaced Pages which Lapsed Pacifist engages in a dispute related in any way to the conflict in Northern Ireland.

If Lapsed Pacifist edits any article from which he is banned, he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the event of repeat violations. After 5 blocks the maximum block shall increase to one year. All blocks to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Lapsed Pacifist#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 19:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)


Shiloh

The Arbitration Committee has reached a final decision in the above case, and the case is now closed.

  • The editors of Shiloh Shepherd Dog and its related articles and talk pages are placed under probation. For details, see the full decision.
  • Meatpuppets may be banned by any administrator for cause. For details, see the full decision.
  • The editors of Shiloh Shepherd Dog are warned to remain civil at all times during discussion on Misplaced Pages.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 18:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Tina_M._Barber has been blocked for one year. Kelly Martin (talk) 18:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Licorne

A final decision has been reached in the above arbitration case, and it has been closed.

The following remedies apply:

  • Licorne banned for a year
  • Licorne is placed indefinitely on Misplaced Pages:Probation
  • Licorne is placed indefinitely on personal attack parole.

Enforced by block.

Further details in the final decision (link above).

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 04:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

1 year block enacted. —BorgHunter (talk) 04:38, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Jason Gastrich

The above arbitration case has been closed and the final decision published.

Jason Gastrich is banned for one year for serious disruption. When he returns to editing, other restrictions will apply; these are detailed in the full final decision. In particular, he is indefinitely restricted to use of one editing account and indefinitely banned from editing the articles Louisiana Baptist University and The Skeptic's Annotated Bible.

For the arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 19:16, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Instantnood 3

The arbitration committee has closed the above case.

Restrictions applying to Huaiwei:

Restrictions applying to Instantnood:

  • Instantnood (talk · contribs · logs) is placed on General Probation indefinitely. Any three administrators may, for good cause, ban him from the site.

For details, see the final decision.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 18:18, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Boothy443

A final decision has been reached in the above arbitration case, and the case has been closed.

Boothy443 (talk · contribs · logs) is subject to a personal attack parole. If he engages in personal attacks, he may be briefly blocked. The maximum block length will be one week. Unlike the standard personal attack parole, the maximum block length will not be increased after five blocks. Blocks are to be logged at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Boothy443#Log of blocks and bans.

For the Arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 17:04, 20 March 2006 (UTC)


Leyasu

The full details are in the case at the link above.

The remedies are:

Enforcement of paroles and probations is by blocking.

For the Arbitration Committee. --Tony Sidaway 19:53, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

KDRGibby

(This is an old case that doesn't appear to be mentioned here.)

KDRGibby is placed on personal attack parole and prohibited from keeping personal attacks. He is also placed on both probation and general probation. These remedies are to be enforced by block. See the case for further details. On behalf of the arbcom, Johnleemk | Talk 18:54, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Dyslexic Agnostic final decision

This case has closed. Full details are in the final decision at the link above.

In brief:

  • T-man, the Wise Scarecrow banned for six months On hold for duration of mentorship
  • T-man, the Wise Scarecrow placed on personal attack parole
  • Dyslexic Agnostic placed on personal attack parole
  • T-man, the Wise Scarecrow placed on Probation
  • Dyslexic Agnostic placed on Probation
  • T-man, the Wise Scarecrow placed under Mentorship

Administrator enforcement is requested in the first instance to enforce the six month ban. On hold for duration of mentorship.

Two to three mentors, administrators knowledgeable in the case, are to be chosen at a later date.

While any administrators may enforce the ruling, the mentors should be seen as the primary enforcers, and other administrators are encouraged to communicate with them before taking actions. Additionally, the mentors are charged with monitoring and guiding T-man, and maintaining contact with him, as well as helping him to carry on productive communication with others towards the goal of successful collaboration. For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 15:03, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Zeq

This arbitration case has closed. Zeq is banned from articles he has disrupted and placed on Probation. Zeq and Heptor are cautioned regarding sources. Zeq is cautioned regarding removal of well sourced information. Others are cautioned to use the procedures in Misplaced Pages:Resolving disputes. Where applicable, these remedies are to be enforced by block. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 09:49, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

Appeal of VeryVerily

This arbitration case has closed. The one-revert per page per day remedy from Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, VeryVerily, and its associated enforcement, are vacated with respect to VeryVerily. However, the other still applicable remedy, namely that pertaining to discussion of reverts, and its associated enforcement, remain in force. Ruy Lopez is banned from using sockpuppets, and is placed on probation. VeryVerily may appeal to have the remaining remedy lifted in four months. The remedies will be enforced by block. For further details, please see the arbitration case. On behalf of the arbitration committee, Johnleemk | Talk 15:23, 2 March 2006 (UTC)


RJII v. Firebug

This arbitration case has closed. RJII is placed on personal attack parole, probation, general probation, and is cautioned regarding POV editing. Firebug is counseled that Misplaced Pages is a work in progress and that perfection is not to be expected. These remedies (where applicable) shall be enforced by a block of up to one year. For further details, please see the arbitration case. On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Johnleemk | Talk 08:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

Rajput

A final decision has been reached in this case and it has been closed.


Shivraj Singh, DPSingh , Gurkhaboy and all of their sock puppets and all users listed as the "Hindus only side" at Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Rajput/Evidence#involved_users are banned from editing Rajput and related articles. This is to be enforced by the usual escalating blocking policy.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 22:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Carl Hewitt

The Carl Hewitt case has closed.

Carl Hewitt is banned from autobiographical editing regarding himself and his work or that of his students. This ban includes creation of links and categories which refer to that work.

Carl Hewitt is placed on Misplaced Pages:Probation. He may be banned from any article which he disrupts.

Should Carl Hewitt edit any article from which he is banned, he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses. After 5 blocks the maximum block shall increase to one year.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 07:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Pedophilia_userbox_wheel_war

As Dschor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) has continued to make edits relating to the pedophilia template which he was blocked for recreating and was unblocked only to respond to this case, pending resolution of this matter he is banned from editing any pages other than these Arbitration pages and his own user and talk page. He may be briefly blocked should he edit any other page. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 23:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

The above temporary injunction is now obsolete and superceded by the final result of the case (which closed two weeks ago). For attempting to aggravate the dispute in order to make a point, Dschor is banned from Misplaced Pages for 2 months. Additionally, he is placed on Misplaced Pages:Probation. After he finishes serving out his ban, administrators may ban him from any page he disrupts, and/or ban him from Misplaced Pages for up to a week for each provocative edit he makes. If, after two months, Dschor can demonstrate good behavior, he may appeal the probation. Dschor and Paroxysm are prohibited from creating or editing userboxes (either templatized or hard-coded into a userpage). For attempting to aggravate the dispute in order to make a point, SPUI is banned from Misplaced Pages for 10 days. Additionally, he is placed on Misplaced Pages:Probation. After he finishes serving out his ban, administrators may ban him from any page he disrupts, and/or ban him from Misplaced Pages for up to a week for each provocative edit he makes. If, after two months, SPUI can demonstrate good behavior, he may appeal the probation. Johnleemk | Talk 09:33, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Copperchair

The arbitration committee has banned this user indefinitely from editing Star Wars and War on Terrorism. He may be banned from other articles that he disrupts under the Misplaced Pages:Probation order in his case. To be enforced by block. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Copperchair.

For the arbitration committee. --Tony Sidaway 04:25, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Gibraltarian

The arbitration committee has decided to let the indefinite block on Gibraltarian stand. The following remedies will apply if and when he is ever unblocked by an administrator. It is recommended that he not be unblocked unless he promises to comply with this decision.

For the arbitation committee. Tony Sidaway|Talk 10:40, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Tommstein injunction

Tommstein (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned, until the conclusion of this Arbitration, from editing any page except those directly related to Arbitration involving him, and his own User and User Talk pages. He may be blocked for a short time, up to three days, for any edit violating this injunction, and all such edits may be reverted by any editor without regard to the limitations of the three revert rule. Dmcdevit·t 07:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Zeq and Ian Pitchford temporary injunctions

For constant edit warring, Zeq (talk · contribs) and Ian Pitchford (talk · contribs) are banned from editing Palestinian exodus and 1948 Arab-Israeli War until the conclusion of their case. See Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Zeq. Dmcdevit·t 05:19, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

AndriyK banned, and other remedies

Per the final decision in AndriyK:

  • AndriyK is banned for one month from Misplaced Pages for creating irreversible page moves.
  • Until by consensus he has agreed to a suitable and mutually agreed naming convention using the guideline Misplaced Pages:Naming conflict, AndriyK is prohibited from moving pages, or changing the content of articles which relate to Ukrainian names, especially those of historical interest.
  • Should AndriyK move any page or change the content of any article to conform with his preferred usage before an agreement is reached as to a naming convention concerning historical Russian names and places he may be briefly blocked, up to a week in the case of repeat offenses. After 5 blocks the maximum block shall be increased to one year.
  • Moved pages which have become irreversible by adding to the page history of the redirect page may be moved back without the necessity of a vote at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kelly Martin (talk) 04:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Ciz (as amended)

If Ciz (using whatever account or IP address) edits Zoophilia or its closely related articles, or makes any edit which relates to zoophilia, bestiality, animal sexuality, or human-animal relationships in any article, or their talk pages, such changes made may be reverted by any editor and any administrator may, at his/her discretion, briefly block Ciz (up to a week in the case of repeat violations). After 5 blocks the maximum block shall increase to one year. As adopted by the Arbitration Committee 15:51, January 26, 2006 Kelly Martin (talk) 03:15, 27 January 2006 (UTC)



Wyss

According to checkuser Wyss has returned and edited as The_Witch (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). She and Ted_Wilkes (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) are banned from editing articles which relate to homosexuality or bisexuality and are on general probation, see Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Wilkes,_Wyss_and_Onefortyone#Proposed_remedies. Fred Bauder 19:13, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Everyking will not interact with or comment about Snowspinner

X) Everyking shall not interact with, or comment in any way (directly or indirectly) about, Snowspinner, on any page in Misplaced Pages. Should he do so, he may be blocked by any administrator (other than Snowspinner) for a short time, up to one week; after the fifth such violation, the maximum block length shall be one year.

Kelly Martin (talk) 01:54, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

I blocked Everyking for a violation of the above for 24 hours on December 29, and for 48 hours on January 7. SlimVirgin 19:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


FuelWagon

  • Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/FuelWagon v. Ed Poor
  • FuelWagon is banned, until the conclusion of this Arbitration, from editing any page except those directly related to Arbitration involving him, and his own User and User Talk pages. He may be blocked for a short time, up to three days, for any edit violating this injunction, and all such edits may be reverted by any editor without regard to the limitations of the three revert rule.

James F. (talk) 17:50, 4 December 2005 (UTC)


Pigsonthewing

  • Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Pigsonthewing
  • Pigsonthewing is banned, until the conclusion of this Arbitration, from editing any page in Karmafist's user space (but not user talk space). He may be blocked for a short time, up to three days, for any edit violating this injunction, and all such edits may be reverted by any editor without regard to the limitations of the three revert rule.
  • Due to repeated personal attacks, Pigsonthewing is subject, until the conclusion of this Arbitration, to a standard personal attack parole. Any administrator may ban Pigsonthewing for a short time, up to three days, for any edit which, in the opinion of that administrator, constitutes a personal attack.

James F. (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)




Rktect banned from editing weights and measures

Rktect (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is banned indefinitely from editing any article which relates to weights and measures (metrology). Rktect may be briefly blocked should he do so, see Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Rktect#Remedies

Ban on editors involved in Bogdanov Affair

All user accounts used by participants in the external controversy (involving the Bogdanov Affari) are banned from Misplaced Pages pending resolution of this matter. The criteria for determining external involvement shall be a review of their edit history, it being presumed that if the vast majority of their edits were to the Bogdanov Affair and related pages such as this arbitration that they are not Misplaced Pages editors but persons involved in the external dispute. This group includes: YBM (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), XAL (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), ProfesseurYIN (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Igor B. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), CatherineV (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 82.123.187.53 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Laurence67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), EE Guy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 82.123.46.149 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), 82.123.57.232 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log), Luis A. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and all others who meet the criteria. Rbj (talk · contribs), a regular Misplaced Pages editor, and User-multi error: "Ze_miguel" is not a valid project or language code (help)., a new editor who has edited other areas, are banned from editing Bogdanov Affair, pending resolution of this matter.

A less restrictive injunction Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Regarding The Bogdanov Affair/Proposed decision#Ban on editing Bogdanov Affair is under consideration and may replace the total bans. Fred Bauder 19:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)

Ban extended to talk page

See Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_arbitration/Regarding_The_Bogdanov_Affair#Ban_extended_to_talk_page.

Additional editors included

Editors blocked following closing of the case


Limited ban on ArmchairVexillologistDon

2.3) User:ArmchairVexillologistDon is banned from the editing of any Misplaced Pages page related to vexillology, fascism, or Canada pending a decision their arbitration case. What constitutes "Vexillogy," "fascism," or "Canada" shall be interpreted broadly. Fred Bauder 21:15, 12 October 2005 (UTC)


AI

  • Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/AI
  • AI (under any username) is banned from Misplaced Pages pending the final resolution of all legal disputes with Misplaced Pages. Any edits AI attempts to make until this time, under any account or IP, should be immediately reverted.
  • AI is instructed to use only this account, and no anonymous IPs. What editing constitutes AI's is up to any sysop to decide. If AI violates this, any sysop is authorised to ban them for up to a month for one-off offences, and up to a year for repeat offences.
  • Further, AI is banned from refactoring dialogue on talk pages, or rearranging any talk page, including material which constitutes "personal comments" or personal attacks (this applies to all talk pages except AI's own user talk page), and also banned from editing any article related to the Church of Scientology. If AI violates either of these, any sysop is authorised to ban them for up to 24 hours for one-off offences, and up to a week per violation for repeat offences.

James F. (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

I a munclear as to whether the 'legal disputes', for which Al is currently on indefinite block, are resolved but I'm guessing a big No. In any case his creation of User:Nikitchenko, a sockpuppet, warrants a further year ban, probably consecutive to the resolution of the 'legal issues'. The Land 19:52, 27 May 2006 (UTC)



Tkorrovi and Paul Beardsell

Trey Stone

Baku Ibne, et al.

Herschelkrustofsky

Gzornenplatz, Kevin Baas, Shorne, VeryVerily

See also "Gzornenplatz" above

Kuban kazak

Following the remedies in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Kuban kazak Kuban kazak (talk · contribs) is banned from editing Misplaced Pages-en.

--Tznkai (talk), on behalf of the Arbitration Committee 04:44, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Pcarbonn

Pursuant to Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Cold fusion#Final decision, Pcarbonn (talk · contribs) is banned from editing Cold fusion and related articles and pages for the duration of one year.

--Tznkai (talk), on behalf of the Arbitration Committee 21:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Piotrus 2

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The remedies that have been adopted are as follows;

(A) That discussing an issue on IRC necessarily excludes those editors who do not use IRC from the discussion (and excludes almost all non-administrators from the discussion if it takes place in #wikipedia-en-admins), and therefore, such IRC discussion is never the equivalent of on-wiki discussion or dispute resolution;
(B) That the practice of off-wiki "block-shopping" is strongly deprecated, and that except where there is an urgent situation and no reasonable administrator could disagree with an immediate block (e.g., ongoing blatant or pagemove vandalism or ongoing serious BLP violations), the appropriate response for an administrator asked on IRC to block an editor is to refer the requester to the appropriate on-wiki noticeboard; and
(C) That even though the relationship between the "wikipedia" IRC channels and Misplaced Pages remains ambiguous, any incidents of personal attacks or crass behavior in #wikipedia-en-admins are unwelcome and reflect adversely on all users of the channel.
  • Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will open a general request for comments regarding the arbitration enforcement process, particularly where general sanctions are concerned. Having received such comments, the Committee will consider instituting suitable reforms to the enforcement process.
  • Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will convene a community discussion for the purpose of developing proposed reforms to the content dispute resolution process.
  • Following the conclusion of this case, the Committee will publish guides to presenting evidence and using the workshop page.

Please see the above link to read the full case.

For the Arbitration Committee,

Ryan Postlethwaite 10:29, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

RFC HELP desperately neeed

This user RFC is appallingly out-of-hand and being used in a terrible manner on MANY MANY fronts. We could really use an admin to give advice not only on which areas of the RFC should be moved to the discussion page, but also on the discussion page itself: everything is coming under intense scrutiny, from who is authorized to certify the RFC to if the RFC itself is valid. It's a HUGE mess. 207.237.33.36 (talk) 01:21, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

This request belongs at WP:ANI or WP:AN. This page is only for enforcement of Arbitration cases, and requests here should only be made by clerks or Arbitrators. Hersfold 19:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Category: