Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Twinsday (talk | contribs) at 17:07, 7 May 2009 (→Current requests for protection). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

Shortcuts WP:RFPP WP:RFP WP:RPP Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism. Skip to table of contents requests to raise protection lower protection requested edits (purge) Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level Request protection Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit

Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Current requests for protection

Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Lost Tapes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of recent IP vandalism. Twinsday (talk) 17:07, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Cobra Group (Marketing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection. Constant reverse edits all by unregistered users taking anything to do with negative press out of the article. Edits obviously being made by owners/employees and should be watched for potential escalation to full protection. History says it all Cokehabit (talk) 15:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Christ myth theory (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

semi-protection, there appears to be some dispute between IP's on this talk page, the history explains it all. Momo san 15:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Edgar Allan Poe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection Excessive vandalism from multiple sources. I would suggest considering indefinite semi-protection because of the frequency of these sorts of requests; I leave it in more capable hands. Thanks in advance. --Midnightdreary (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. I agree about the level of vandalism but let's try not to go down the indef route.--RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 15:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree that it's a bit extreme. Thanks for looking! --Midnightdreary (talk) 16:55, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Bianca Ryan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, Repeatedly subject to vandalism. Some of it such as is likely the work of a chronic troll who, using a number of screen names, is known to lurk in and raid her website forum and constantly leaves derogatory comments on YouTube videos of her, as well as on videos posted by fans of hers. The cited ex. has all the earmarks of their posts - same kind of wording complete with misspellings that they're known for. This has been going on for a couple of years or more. This guy isn't going to go away. They come and go at random, temporary semi-protect isn't enough.Docsavage20 (talk) 14:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Adolf hitler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

This request is for the lower-case redirect, not the actual article. At least semi-protection, if not outright full protection. Vandals have changed the redirect to point to other articles, and there's really no reason why the redirect should ever point to anything other than Adolf Hitler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (capitalized). --Elkman 14:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Template:Preamble to the United States Constitution text (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection This is the text of the Preamble to the US Constitution. The text is changed quite a bit and a discussion has been taking place at Talk:Preamble_to_the_United_States_Constitution#Some_means_to_lock_the_text that proposed a template be made with the text and then full protection since there is no reason for the text to change. A new name 2008 (talk) 13:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Vietnamese New Native Language (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Various IPs and users keep removing the AfD template. Protect, then look at the IPs/Users responsible. Ironholds (talk) 11:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by TeaDrinker (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Xymmax _{So let it be done} 12:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

America's Next Top Model, Cycle 12 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Last semi-protection expired two and a half hours ago. For one week and three days. Continuations of IP edits adding an unspecific call-out order in next week's finale. ApprenticeFan 11:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 12:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Chemistry (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection, Anonymous user keeps introducing unnecessary changes to the page - 1, 2, 3 and 4 - removing factual information (the CD reference numbers) and introducing new, unsourced titles. Blocking isn't applicable because they keep changing IP and ignoring my warnings. ~~ 08:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 11:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Michael93555 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection, I had to re-start my user page. . Michael (Talk) 07:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Done Lectonar (talk) 08:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Drake (entertainer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism. Excessive, daily vandalism in this article is becoming an issue. It was previously protected about one month ago. Blackjays1 (talk) 06:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Lectonar (talk) 08:03, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Leah Remini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Persistent vandalism by suspected sock puppet IP's 74.45.47.140 and 74.45.41.201. Percxyz (talk) 05:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Kevin (talk) 05:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Andy Goldsworthy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection: the article inexplicably continues to be a target for anonymous vandalism (probably from students, judging from the inane edits). — Cheers, JackLee 05:02, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - Kevin (talk) 05:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Slash kh8812 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection user talk of blocked user. E Wing (talk) 04:38, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined - talk page editing already disabled. Tiptoety 05:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

ILUG-Bengaluru (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary create-protection, i keep hitting a bad batch of CSD patrollers who have deleted the article within an hour of my creating the page, which hardly gives me time to complete the content and add adequate links and references. svaksha (talk) 04:29, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined since we cannot salt already-created articles. -Jeremy 05:35, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

List of countries by size of armed forces (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

infinite semi protection - Lots of edits by IPs that are not sourced and also many vandal edits. Semi protected before, but it goes back to the same after protection expires. Nearly impossible to revert edits on a page like this. Corpx (talk) 03:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 11:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Preamble to the United States Constitution (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Since April 23, only one edit has been legit; the rest have been either Vandalism or reversions thereof. SMP0328. (talk) 03:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Just watchlist and revert. Lectonar (talk) 08:43, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Mr. T (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Last protection expired April 25th, the edit history since then speaks for itself. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:34, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Icestorm815 • Talk 02:58, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Jester (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Ongoing vandalism. --Smilo Don (talk) 01:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Icestorm815 • Talk 03:12, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Template:GFDL-presumed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite full protection, Deprecated and unacceptable template, now redirects to Template:Di-no license. Should not be changed. ViperSnake151  Talk  23:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined No need for protection now that the template has been deleted. Icestorm815 • Talk 07:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Pikachu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection; an IP is edit-warring with myself and other users over trivia. -Jeremy 23:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 11:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Fantasy Ride (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Persistent vandalism and unproductive edits by IP users with the album's release. — Σxplicit 21:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. SoWhy 11:14, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Andrew Peach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect because of a silly ongoing edit war between two IPs. The subject works as a newsreader on BBC Radio 2, but the editors cannot seem to agree on the level of information about this that should be included. Have tried to mediate with little success. TheRetroGuy (talk) 21:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. SoWhy 11:13, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Fair enough, but this is becoming a regular occurrance with neither side apparently willing to reach an agreement. I'll list this again in a few days if the edit warring continues and in the meantime perhaps look at other ways of resolving it (third opinion, etc). TheRetroGuy (talk) 16:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Vilnius (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism by a user User:78.59.190.64 who got recently blocked and is evading it .radek (talk) 19:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by EdJohnston for 2 months. Icestorm815 • Talk 02:24, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Republic of China (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Either semi-protect, because of IP/sock puppets involved in slow revert war between established editors, or full protect, based on the slow edit war over chinese/taiwanese taipei/nanjing terminology. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 19:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by William M. Connolley (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). SoWhy 11:12, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Parental alienation syndrome (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Full protection. Ongoing edit warring for several days with minimal engagement on the talk page. Note that I'm one of the edit warrers. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/_complex 17:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

addendum, since I was going to request this too. I gave a warning that page protection was imminent on the talkpage. . WLU made one uncontroversial change after acknowledging the warning . The other editor Michael H 34 has continued making major controversial changes post acknowledgement. --Slp1 (talk) 18:00, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

I am completely fine with the current wrong version (which is totally wrong in so many ways) being protected as long as it means the talk page can be used fruitfully. WLU (t) (c) Misplaced Pages's rules:/_complex 18:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

I characterize the edits referred to by Slp1, which occurred prior to the request for page protection, as productive, uncontroversial and an attempt at a solution to concerns presented on the talk page. Michael H 34 (talk) 18:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC) Michael H 34

I'm sure you do think your edits were just what you say! Not sure others would agree, FWIW. However, they occurred after I asked you and WLU to voluntarily confine yourself to the talkpage. I warned that I would request page protection if you continued to edit war. Which you did. And here we are! --Slp1 (talk) 19:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined, seems to have calmed down by now. SoWhy 11:11, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for unprotection

• WP:RFUP
• WP:RFPU

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Bristol Palin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, has been protected as a redirect to her moother, but now that she has gone on a media blitz againt teen pregnancy, this makes her notable in her own right. I have placed a request for unprotection in the protecting administrator's talk page, and the protecting administrator has indicated that the page should be unprotected, but has so far failed to follow through. Dems on the move (talk) 16:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Theodore Roosevelt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, Was semi protected October 17, 2008 and won't end until 18 July 2009. No need in a 9 month long protection. This defeats the "encyclopedia anyone can edit" purpose. - ALLST✰R▼ _{wuz here @} 06:44, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Note: Please ask Aude (talk · contribs), the protecting admin, first. SoWhy 11:08, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Template:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unprotection, There is no need to have such strong protection(the template hasn't been edited in 3 years). Other Copyright user templates are either semi-protected, or not protected at all. Smallman12q (talk) 22:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Not unprotected This template is transcluded over hundreds of pages. I'd consider that high visibility. Icestorm815 • Talk 02:27, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac people (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, no need to semi-protect this redirect page (protection settings were moved when page title was changed). Mxipp (talk) 20:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Unprotected SoWhy 11:10, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Elton John (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Please may some unprotect this page for a couple of minutes, just so's that I can correct an error in the Infobox, once I have corrected this error it may be reprotected, if this request for unprotection were to be granted I would be entirely grateful, anyway thank you for your time – 78.145.176.88 (talk) 14:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Not unprotected I'm not going to remove protection for one edit. Instead, please use {{editsemiprotected}} on the article's Talk page, and any editor agreeing with your proposed edit may make the correction. SHEFFIELDSTEEL 15:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Verragio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection, There is no need to protect this page. It looks like someone tried to create a page but it kept getting deleted because of advertising reasons. We would like to create a simple page to describe the company and its history just like other jewelry designers are doing at Wiki. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.161.233.229 (talk • contribs)

We? As in employees of the company? That already tends to set yourselves up for a conflict of interest. You could create a neutral well-sourced article in your IP userspace, and when it is done you can place a {{helpme}} and request an admin move it to the protected page? Syrthiss (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

• WP:RFED

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

Fulfilled/denied requests

Janitor (Scrubs) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Edit-warring about the recently-revealed name of a previously-unnamed character. Probably best left to established users to sort out, as the anon-ip edits appears to include some mischief-making. --Rrburke 01:18, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Yourname (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of indefinite. Tiptoety 23:40, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Yourname (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection user talk of blocked user, IP vandalism of talk page, IP may be sockpuppet of banned user. CardinalDan (talk) 23:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of indefinite. Tiptoety 23:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Chillum (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi protection vandalism. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:16, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely. I assume Chillum will unprotect when the harasser moves on. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 00:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

User talk:83.93.143.8 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection vandalism, blocked user continuously places a huge pic of a vagina on the page. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. -Jeremy 23:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Star Mississippi (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected indefinitely as this seems to be an extended campaign. -Jeremy 23:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

thanks, it is indeed. StarM 00:19, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

User talk:98.212.111.172 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection user talk of blocked user, IP abuse of talk page. CardinalDan (talk) 23:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

User(s) re-blocked with talk page editing disallowed. -Jeremy 23:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

User:DougsTech (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

full protection Edit warring by multiple users on DougsTech's userpage. Cunard (talk) 22:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. by Tiptoety (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Xymmax _{So let it be done} 00:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Ted Leonsis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unprotection Protecting adminstrator claimed "persistent and significant" BLP violations. The only two instances of vandalism in the past year were two edits yesterday. Protection is unwarranted. Grsz 17:04, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

I see you've dropped a note on the protecting admin's talk page. Perhaps we should wait for a response. FYI, the admin seems to have protected in response to this request.--RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 18:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

One of those was a legitimate edit that the same IP eventually provided a source for. The protecting admin seems to be using User:Lar/Liberal Semi, which doesn't exactly mesh with WP:SEMI. Grsz 03:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree with Grasz11's assessment. The protecting administrator is using another user's personal reasons for protection rather than policy reasons, which should be discouraged (there are no grounds in both WP:SEMI and WP:BLP (see Misplaced Pages:BLP#Semi-protection and protection) for such a protection). Seeing that unprotecting this article might result in wheel-warring, I think it should be taken to WP:AN or WP:ANI though. Regards SoWhy 07:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

I see this has been taken to ANI... just as a note, I'll say what I said there. "While the protection is within (a liberal interpretation) of policy, if someone wants to take a particular article to RFPP and ask that it be unprotected, that's fine. If consensus is that it be unprotected, that's fine too. This little experiment is not intended to supplant more official processes. So no worries and thanks for the heads up." It's OK to differ about policy. ++Lar: t/c 17:12, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, Grsz11. Kevin (talk) 22:28, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

The unprotection needs to go to Disney XD--151.199.155.94 (talk) 23:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Don't do it. He's a vandal.--Abce2|Howdy! 23:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Tom Henning Øvrebø (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism. William Avery (talk) 20:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Already protected. (indefinitely !) by Shanes. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 21:05, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

David Ogden Stiers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, A blog has a reported interview w/ him, his publicist says it's fake. People keep adding the info, etc. A cease & desist letter may not be in the distant future if the publicist is to be believed. Portia327 (talk) 20:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 20:54, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Jennette McCurdy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Moderate level of persistent IP vandalism, but on a page of a living person whose traffic (over 2K per day) has doubled in the last six months, and who has a high profile. (Co-star Miranda Cosgrove, with less vandalism, is semi-protected.) Piano non troppo (talk) 20:27, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I'm sympathetic to this request in general, but I only see a couple vandal edits over the last five days. There is a good amount of link spamming, and I would be willing to reconsider if things get much worse. Feel free to relist or request on my talk page as need be. Xymmax _{So let it be done} 21:01, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

1994 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism. Enigma 20:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

• Semi-protected for two weeks. Acalamari 20:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

CN Tower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, All edits are either vandalism or reverts since unprotection. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 19:03, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--GedUK  20:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Tendring Technology College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Frequent recent vandalism by ips. SD5 20:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 20:13, 6 May 2009 (UTC)