Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for arbitration/Nobs01 and others/Evidence - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration | Nobs01 and others

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) at 22:01, 21 November 2005 (Basis for distinction). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:01, 21 November 2005 by Fred Bauder (talk | contribs) (Basis for distinction)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

While it is clear to me that the work of Lyndon LaRouche is original research, while the work of Chip Berlet is peer reviewed research, I am somewhat at a loss to explain exactly why. My preliminary thought is that Chip Berlet is embedded in a progressive matrix which can provide feedback regarding his work, while LaRouche is not, thus free to engage in idiosyncratic musings. Fred Bauder 22:01, 21 November 2005 (UTC)