Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GoneAwayNowAndRetired (talk | contribs) at 16:17, 13 May 2009 (→Notice, warning on your arbcom ban: I have noted this at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/West_Bank - Judea and Samaria#User:Nickh. Thank you.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Arbitrator questions on Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/West_Bank_-_Judea_and_Samaria/Workshop

Kirill has asked some questions here. You are invited to respond. --Tznkai (talk) 22:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/The Independent

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at ], and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Misplaced Pages, please refer to Misplaced Pages:Mediation. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, SlamDiego_←T 01:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the case subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/The Independent. For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 18:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

arb case

Based on the evidence I saw, I think you are right. However, have been involved in a previous case, I think the some of the heads are to get to the real problem makers, the partisan edit warriors. In a previous case, I have been 'reminded' or something like that, suddenly inserted at the last minute after most arbs had already voted without a single ref presented for what I supposedly had done wrong. I have asked multiple times for those refs, and never received them. As for the why, I have my suspicion, but won't voice that. -- Kim van der Linde 20:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Celebration cancelled

OK, no round of wiki-beer for us. I thought a majority was needed for the proposals to pass, but apparently you got thrown in the same ditch as the rest of us. Sorry for dragging you into this. Unless the guidelines amnesty is granted (and I don't have extremely high hopes), I will probably not volunteer much more of my precious time to this ungrateful project. Are you going to apply? MeteorMaker (talk) 23:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

RFAR/West Bank - Judea and Samaria

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. Canadian Monkey (talk · contribs), G-Dett (talk · contribs), MeteorMaker (talk · contribs), Nickhh (talk · contribs), Nishidani (talk · contribs), NoCal100 (talk · contribs), and Pedrito (talk · contribs) are prohibited from editing any Arab-Israeli conflict-related article/talk page or discussing on the dispute anywhere else on the project. Jayjg (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) is also prohibited from editing in the area of conflict, and he is stripped of his status as a functionary and any and all associated privileged access, including the CheckUser and Oversight tools and the checkuser-l, oversight-l, and functionaries-en mailing lists. Jayjg is also thanked for his years of service.

After six months, these editors may individually ask the Arbitration Committee to lift their editing restrictions after demonstrating commitment to the goals of Misplaced Pages and ability to work constructively with other editors. However, restrictions may be temporarily suspended for the exclusive purpose of participating in the discussion of draft guidelines for this area.

In the meantime, the community is strongly urged to pursue current discussions to come to a definitive consensus on the preferred current and historical names of the region that is the source of conflict in this case. Note that this must be consistent with current Misplaced Pages guidelines on reliable sources, a neutral point of view, and naming conventions. This decision will be appended onto this case within two months from the close of the case.

For the Arbitration Committee, hmwithτ 17:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Discuss this

The Independent

I believe your participation in that article's Talk page violates the conditions of your topic ban, and have asked for clarification here. NoCal100 (talk) 14:19, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

• Please note the arbitration ruling states "For the purposes of editing restrictions in this case, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as it was defined in the Palestine-Israel articles case, encompassing the entire set of Arab-Israeli conflict-related articles, broadly interpreted, as well as any edits on the subject of the Palestine/Israel dispute on any other article or talk page, or any other page throughout the project." Basically, all the sanctioned editors need to stay well away from I-P issues and find something else to do. If you want to discuss the circulation figures for The Independent, be my guest, but once you start in on their coverage of I-P issues, you've violated your topic ban. Blocking is the next step. Thanks. Thatcher 16:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Notice, warning on your arbcom ban

Per that discussion, please consider this an official administrative warning--you are barred from any discussion or edits broadly construed of anything to do with the I/P conflicts. Should you edit these areas in any way again, you can and will be blocked 24 hours for your next edit after this notification. Apologies. rootology (C)(T) 16:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

I have noted this at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/West_Bank - Judea and Samaria#User:Nickh. Thank you. rootology (C)(T) 16:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC)