This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Larry_Sanger (talk) at 00:36, 20 November 2001. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 00:36, 20 November 2001 by Larry_Sanger (talk)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)There is a link to 'false document' here, but the meaning of the false document article appears to relate to artistic creations, rather than to forgeries of this sort.
We could either:
- remove the link
- change the 'false document' article to reflect the fact that there are non-artistic forgeries
- change the wording to 'forgery'
-- The Anome
Precisely my point.
Also, is it actually agreed by all that it is false? Do there exist rabid anti-semites who believe it's true? If so, then we should say something to the effect that most historians and other sane :-) people believe it's false, but there are a small handful of anti-semites who believe it's true. That is important information, if true, and must be stated fairly if the article is to cohere with the neutral point of view. --LMS