Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Caden - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Daedalus969 (talk | contribs) at 22:39, 19 May 2009 (Created page with '{{subst:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Blank report template header}} ;Suspected sockpuppets * {{checkuser|1=Corpiestre}} <!--## Add further sockpuppets …'). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:39, 19 May 2009 by Daedalus969 (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{subst:Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Blank report template header}} ;Suspected sockpuppets * {{checkuser|1=Corpiestre}} <!--## Add further sockpuppets …')(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Caden

Caden (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Caden/Archive.


Report date May 19 2009, 22:39 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets

This user shows up out of nowhere and starts defending the suspected sock master, who was previously blocked today, for a day.— dαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Daedalus969


Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.
Comments by other users


CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by — dαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

CU is required as the block, or extention thereof, rests on these CU findings, in that, his block may remain the same, assuming this is just some random vandal that appears to have taken interest in him(I don't think this is likely, too many things don't add up), but to the point, if this suspected sock, is found to be a sock, further action needs to be taken in regards to the master account.— dαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments


Conclusions



Categories: