This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Enkyo2 (talk | contribs) at 02:46, 1 June 2009 (→Wikicode). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:46, 1 June 2009 by Enkyo2 (talk | contribs) (→Wikicode)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) Tenmei (天明) = "dawn"Tenmei (天明) was a Japanese era name (年号, nengō, lit. year name) after An'ei and before Kansei. This period spanned the years from 1781 through 1789. The new era name of Tenmei (meaning "dawn") was created to mark the enthronement of Emperor Kōkaku-tennō (光格天皇). The previous era ended and the new one commenced in An'ei 11, on the 2nd day of the 4th month.
How best to make good use of this venue?
I've been reading an unlikely 17th-century Internet book:
- Titsingh, Isaac, ed. (1834). . Nipon o daï itsi ran; ou, Annales des empereurs du Japon, tr. par M. Isaac Titsingh avec l'aide de plusieurs interprètes attachés au comptoir hollandais de Nangasaki; ouvrage re., complété et cor. sur l'original japonais-chinois, accompagné de notes et précédé d'un Aperçu d'histoire mythologique du Japon, par M. J. Klaproth. Paris: Oriental Translation Fund of Great Britain and Ireland.--Two digitized examples of this rare book have now been made available online: (1) from the library of the University of Michigan, digitized January 30, 2007; and (2) from the library of Stanford University, digitized June 23, 2006. Click here to read the original text in French.
My current plan is to continue posting some of what I learn from the Annales des empereurs du Japon -- primarily in nengō-related and in tennō-related Wiki-stubs in English and French, but sometimes in other areas as well. I anticipate that the initial phase of this project is likely to continue through mid-2010.
Sandboxes
- -- William Shakespeare, Henry VI, part 3, Act II, scene ii, line 859.
______________
______________
_______________
_______________
One never notices what has been done; one can only see what remains to be done. -- Marie Curie
WikiProject Japan Barnsensu Award | ||
- Yamada, Kuniaki. Power and Rule in the Kanto Region During the Muromachi Period : Hoko-shu in Attendence at Kamakura-Fu (鎌倉府の奉公衆). The Historical Society of Japan. Shigaku zasshi. 96:3, 310-341, 412-413. Abstract.
- 日本穣 = nuance?
Standards of behaviour
- Active arbitrators (as of 23 May 2009)
- Carcharoth (talk · contribs · email) (carcharothwpgmail.com)
- Casliber (talk · contribs · email)
- Cool Hand Luke (talk · contribs · email) (User.CoolHandLukegmail.com)
- Coren (talk · contribs · email) (marcuberbox.org)
- FayssalF (talk · contribs · email) (Fayssal Fertakh, szvestgmail.com)
- FloNight (talk · contribs · email)
- Jayvdb (talk · contribs · email) (John Vandenberg, jayvdbgmail.com)
- Kirill Lokshin (talk · contribs · email) (kirill.lokshingmail.com)
- Newyorkbrad (talk · contribs · email) (newyorkbradgmail.com)
- Risker (talk · contribs · email)
- Rlevse (talk · contribs · email)
- Roger Davies (talk · contribs · email) (roger.davies.wikigmail.com)
- Stephen Bain (talk · contribs · email) (aka "bainer", formerly Thebainer, stephen.baingmail.com)
- Vassyana (talk · contribs · email) (Pete Sienkiewicz, vassyanagmail.com)
- Wizardman (talk · contribs · email) (wizardmanwikigmail.com)
A. City of Stonington, Victoria: Toorak Bowling Club
B. Australian Parliament: Reflections on the House and votes of the House:
- "Building a taxonomy and nomenclature of collaborative writing to improve interdisciplinary research and practice" (abstract), The Journal of Business Communication. January 1, 2004.
- Misplaced Pages:Process is important
Yushima Seidō
:GA review (see here for criteria) -- copied from Talk:Charter Oath
- 1. It is well written
- 2. It is factually accurate and verifiable
- 3. It is broad in its coverage
- 4. It follows the neutral point of view policy
- 5. It is stable
- 6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic
- One trap is not modeling it correctly—not modeling it according to object-oriented principles.
- It is easy to model things incorrectly in XML. As an example, XML has no formal relation between a parent element and a child element.
- I can have “person” as a parent element, and a child element could be “hair color.” But I could just as easily have a child element be “works for.”
- “Works for” and “hair color” are very different things. “Hair color” is intrinsic to the person and cannot be separated from that person. But “works for” is not intrinsic to a person and can change from time to time.
- If you model these things on object-oriented principles, then intrinsic characteristics should be attributes instead of sub-elements. Why? An element cannot be separated from intrinsic attributes.
- Scenic panorama in Asakusa Park, Tokyo: image & advertisement (in Japanese)
Fg2:Undoing an edit about a posthumous name and a shrine. Can't find mention of it in Japanese Misplaced Pages. It would be a welcome addition with a reliable source.
Remembering
Those who tried to help
... and those who did not
- No: User:LordAmeth ≠ AGF, User:Nick Dowling ≠ V
- Blocked from talk page
- No: User:Caspian blue ≠ WP:C
- No: User:Caspian blue ≠ WP:AGF
- Category:Logical fallacies
- Titsingh, Isaac. (1834). Annales des empereurs du japon, pp. 420-421.