This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Trekphiler (talk | contribs) at 05:24, 29 November 2005 ("Encrypted" post). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:24, 29 November 2005 by Trekphiler (talk | contribs) ("Encrypted" post)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Revenge
The Germans may have "redeemed" themselves by winning in the same location as the loss in 1410, but how exactly did they get revenge if they were fighting the Russians and not the Poles? Did Hindenburg really view this as "revenge", or is it just a poor choice of words? Appleseed 15:13, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
- I've removed the following line from the end of the article:
- Hindenburg saw this battle as a fitting revenge for the defeat of the Teutonic Knights.
- Feel free to put it back in with an explanation or reference. Appleseed 16:59, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
Encrypted
Kahn's Codebreakers indicates the Russian signals were encrypted, & broken by the Germans, not sent en clair. Can someone settle the dispute? Trekphiler 05:24, 29 November 2005 (UTC)