This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Daedalus969 (talk | contribs) at 01:58, 27 June 2009 (→Clash of Arms: withdrawn). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:58, 27 June 2009 by Daedalus969 (talk | contribs) (→Clash of Arms: withdrawn)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Clash of Arms
- Clash of Arms (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Hints of notability, but all a google search comes up is with places to buy the game, this wikipedia page, and the page fore the game's official website. — Dædαlus 00:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 01:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. Winners of Origins Awards are generally considered notable. I've cited the appropriate pages for the two awards mentioned in the article. Article could easily be expanded with further discussion of their line (which I admit I'm only passingly familiar with). --Rindis (talk) 15:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- keep I think the two Origins awards are enough. That said, expanding the article by describing the two games and redirecting them to here would be a good way to add more here. Hobit (talk) 00:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Winning a notable industry award twice is clear evidence of notability. Edward321 (talk) 01:07, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
- Withdrawn - Same as said before, withdrawn, based on the fact of notable awards cited.— Dædαlus 01:58, 27 June 2009 (UTC)